Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Ron Paul talks about Bernanke's testimony

Ron Paul talks about Fed chairman Ben Bernanke's testimony in front of the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. Our economy faces enormous difficulties and one of the biggest culprits is ...  
 
Customize

More From: fagan411

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to Ron Paul vs. Ben Bernanke
334 ratings
Sign in to rate
16,675 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (1)

View All - Play All
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (81)   Options

Loading...
annahawley (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Texas needs to vote this guy into retirement
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
irrationalxuber (9 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Inflation only becomes a tax after monetary increases begin to contribute to an increase in money-wages. This occurs at levels of output to some extent before full employment and completely after full employment. Read The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money Chapter 21
hoodoo961 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Wow, someone else who has actually read the General Theory. I didn't know there were others out there. Thats what I always tell these people who bash Keynes, to read the General Theory before talking trash about it. It all makes sense once you've read it.
Vnntbls (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@irrationalxuber

It becomes a tax as soon as it affects prices, due to sticky wages, as well as the time structure of capital. Likewise, you can't decouple the short from the long run.
irrationalxuber (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes to a certain extent it is a tax, but it is distinct from the arbitrary devaluation by the government and is mitigated to the degree that of additional goods are being produced, and the social benefits of a greater level of employment. Arbitrary taxation, by analogy, is as if at a poker table the government deals itself more chips without adding to the pot, where as latter type is as if a player was allowed to buy in for the same amount of chips using less money.
PTTHOR (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This can't work... the two countries that would share our same currency you speak of the (Amero) don't have the gold, or silver to support their own countries, so what would their Amero's be backed by?
The way it is supposed to happen with the Amero, is to erase the borders first by the means of "Free trade agreements" and then all three nations would merge financially (like the EU) and then they survive by leaching off of our wealth and resources.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
friendlyjun (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
rusH1023 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+7
Marked as spam
It's obvious that these issues are WAY above your head. You have no clue what you're talking about. Ron Paul doesn't want a free market economy anymore. He's AGAINST the Fed and the Shock Tactics/Capitalism that's been the precedent with the Bush Administration.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.