JP
Upload

This video is unavailable.

Star Wars Vs. Star Trek

TheGreatLink TheGreatLink·82 videos
3,724

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
406,649
Like     Dislike 186

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like TheGreatLink's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike TheGreatLink's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add TheGreatLink's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Nov 21, 2008

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (8,235)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • PrimeDirective96

    It doesnt even matter if SW durasteel is canon or not. It wont matter because it wil not make SW ships immune to ST weapons.

    Although durasteel contains "neutronium" it is a completely different substance to star trek "neutronium". In ST it is a material composed entirely of neutrons and is the same material found in the cores of neutron stars. In SW however it is described as being "a metallic element". Therefore the two are not the same, so SW durasteel is not resistant to ST weapons.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PrimeDirective96's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate PrimeDirective96's comment.
  • diskpanic

    LOL This argument is just so desperately Vaderish that I am not even certain what I'm responding to. You act like "durasteel" is somehow impregnable. Even though the word "durasteel" appears ZERO times in the movies. In fact, the source of the word "durasteel" comes from the ROLE-PLAYING GAME. LOL Weaksauce. The same source that says that Stormtrooper armor is somehow this amazingly badass armor... that somehow leave the wearer susceptible to stone age weapon wielding, primitive, hairy midgets!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to HolyknightVader999 (Show the comment)
  • diskpanic

    What we see in the movies is the last thing Vadering Vaders like Vader want to talk about. The technical and engineering limitations of the Imperial fleet are so obvious that only a Vader (because the word "stupid asshole" just doesn't even begin to encompass the level of insipid willful stupidity that Vader displays on a daily basis, so I have coined the word "Vader" to express this mind-blowing level of stupidity) like Vader could possibly miss it and further be surprised we'd bring it up.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to Mr48GOAT (Show the comment)
  • diskpanic

    "All slower than SW Starfighters."

    Doesn't matter when the Federation ships are ALL armed with FTL targeting systems. We know what happens to fighters that go against capital ships in Star Trek. They don't last very long. None of the major powers in Star Trek deploy fighter sized craft other than the Federation. And the Federation will only use such fighter craft against the Cardassians and the Dominion.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to HolyknightVader999 (Show the comment)
  • diskpanic

    "the biggest ships in Trek are shown rolling, turning, evading."

    So true. In order to avoid running into each other, Star Destroyers are forced to take "evasive maneuvers". That's what happens when you fly around in a cheese wedge that's a mile long. And even given THREE Star Destroyers, they fail to capture or even disable the Millennium Falcon. That's the most amusing bit. And the Falcon even lost its deflector shields.

    Hell, it wouldn't matter if the Star Destroyers caught them.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to Mr48GOAT (Show the comment)
  • diskpanic

    So, DS, now that we all know that we all know that you are an amazing idiot clown, and only the most incomprehensibly stupid Star Wars fanboy could ever imagine that you have a shred of dignity left... I leave you with this.

    You, sir, are an idiot. Not only have you proven yourself woefully outmatched in a battle of wits, you have proven that you will resort to lying about your motives to save face. LOL You, sir, are a douche, and you always will be, in everything you ever do or have done.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to David Smith (Show the comment)
  • diskpanic

    LMAO You are a fucking idiot, DS. You have not been "trolling", you duncebag. Let me tell you why I know this, you adolescent little douchebag.

    YOU lost your cool. Yes, you call capped. LOL You even resorted to being a doucheclown and flinging names, after trying so hard to pretend that you are reasonable. NOW, that you so thoroughly have had your ass handed to you, repeatedly resort to the beggar's position. You pretend to have been trolling me, the entire time... when it's quite the opposite.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate diskpanic's comment.
    in reply to David Smith (Show the comment)
  • David Smith

    ROFLMAO, it's a movie or a low budget TV show, it's not REAL!!!! I have just been having fun trolling you, getting crazier and crazier with my posts just to see what you would say. I do want to thank you for the entertainment, you gave me a lot of laughs!!!!!!!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Smith's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Smith's comment.
    in reply to diskpanic (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later