Top Comments
All Comments (629)
-
So should we say about 400 people didn't get any satisfaction from this song?
-
The original is epic yes but this is a fun sexy cover why can't you like both or if you don't like it just don't come here.
-
@jahspromise nah man, Im going to college to study Music Business Administration & Management, I know what Im talking about. Britneys raw, sexy voice adds a unique femine twist to the song and makes it even sexier from a womans perspective. Britney is a cultural phenmonen and a musical genius!
-
@ClarksonLoveFF lol u know her name could be from the name "gilderoy lockhart"
XD
-
@broadwaylove52 better than miley covering nirvana
oh God why.....
-
@jahspromise UM... FUCK YEA!!!!!!
now GTFO
-
@yuyu776 Um... HELL NO!!!!!!
-
@TheMusicalMan1993 YOU MUST BE TONE DEAF!!!!!
-
this is shit
-
I f*cking love this cover! Shut up and just enjoy the song
omg if britney sang this song first and roling stones covered it yall would be saying they ruined it cuz tbh she sings it way better the original version is loud and scratchy and belchy and this one is gentle and smooth and sexy! so fuck you....
yuyu776 3 months ago 22
Let's face it, men. She dd it good. Even, i can imagine Sir. Mick Jagger dancing hot at this. Don't you?
klinkerkk 1 month ago 21