Little Rock Rally for the WM3
Uploader Comments (LazyRayFinkleFilms)
Top Comments
-
The hair was found entwined in the shoelace used on Michael Moore, Not Stevie. True it doesn't prove Hobbs is guilty, but the lack of physical evidence against anybody is very curious.
That single hair wouldn't be enough to convict Hobbs today, yet those three were convicted on zero physical evidence! That combined with a false confession, hearsay, and "expert" testimony from a guy who bought his degree from a discredited diploma mill.
Those 3 little boys deserve justice based on REAL evidence
-
This case involves not 1 but 2 tragedies, # 1 - 3 precious boys were killed. # 2 - A vicious killer remains free while 3 innocent boys are convicted of a crime they did NOT commit! WMPD should be ashamed of their complete incompetence. Not only do they lose important evidence or fail to collect it in the first place, but they point their fingers at 3 innocent boys who had nothing to do with it! WMPD is a disgrace to law enforcement!
All Comments (65)
-
too bad natalie went to the wrong website to find the facts.now its too late.more and more ppl are finding out the truth everyday. natalie is obviously lying bc there have been alot of ppl opening their mouths and debating their innocense and its real easy to find all over the net. its mind blowing how many ppl will just lie about this case but its hard to tell if theyre lying or have been lied to and they are passing on that lie. either way its got alot of ppl confused. guilty as charged
-
@iamIegion - Do u really think 3 teenagers especially 1 with a low IQ could commit this horrible crime w/o leaving some evidence such as their own blood, hair, semen, saliva, etc.? The original prosecutor said himself they had very little evidence in this case & ALL the evidence was circumstantial, which means it does NOT directly link the WM3 to the murders. U obviously have not researched this case therefore u have no idea what u r talking about & your comments r ridiculous.
-
As I have said before I began researching this case, because I was positive they were guilty. In my mind at that time people are not found guilty & sentenced to death unless they are really guilty. Well, after researching the actual evidence in this case I'm convinced there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE linking the WM3 to this crime. If you take away the testimony of certain witnesses who have admitted lying on the stand you have absolutely NOTHING linking the WM3 to this crime.
-
iamlegion - For those of you who don't understand...in an Alford Plea, the criminal defendant does NOT admit the act, but admits that the prosecution could likely prove the charge. In this case, the WM3 took the Alford Plea ONLY because of the previous conviction. It doesn't mean they are admitting their guilt. Although, the court will pronounce the defendants guilty, the defendant's maintain their innocence. If you had been wrongfully convicted & spent 18-years in prison what would you do?
-
The defendants by acknowledging there was sufficient evidence towards guilt pretty much destroyed the supporter efforts to dismiss the evidence. All these years of back & forth between "nons" & "supporters" arguing about if there was sufficient evidence only to have the 3 convicted admit there was.
These 3 have confessed their way right out of prison thanks to you supporters. You helped free 3 child killers. You must be very proud?
-
@wm3buster - You claim that there is quite a bit of convincing evidence pointing only to & directly to the WM3...what specific evidence are you referring to? I have seen no evidence whatsoever which is convincing nor points to the WM3. If you are so convinced they are guilty then why not share with the rest of us this convincing evidence which points only to the WM3?
-
@rtyoufree - I totally agree this world has enough stupid people, but I believe you win hands down the award for being the most stupid person in the world! Congrats! Your ignorance is astounding! The trial transcripts only prove that the judge and the prosecutors in this case were only interested in making names for themselves to progress their careers. They didn't care if a child killer remained free nor do they care that they are responsible for imprisoning 3 innocent teenagers.
-
@wm3buster - Well, as a matter of fact I have opened my eyes to the evidence & have reviewed it thoroughly. I'm 100% convinced there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE LINKING THE WM3 TO THIS CRIME! If there is so much overwhelming evidence pointing to the WM3 as you claim then why has the Arkansas Supreme Court granted them new hearings? Obviously, the evidence isn't as convincing as you may think nor does it point to the WM3!
if you can't see they are guilty by watching paradise lost, and then reading the trial transcrips you should just kill yourself because the world has enough stupid people.
rtyoufree 3 years ago
As I said at the end of the movie, I encourage people to find out the facts for themsleves and do their own research. That's the purpose of the film: to raise awareness about the WM3 cause and the case. I have my own opinion, but I am not going to tout it until people's ears bleed. And I don't think encouraging me to commit hara kari is going to help anything.
LazyRayFinkleFilms 3 years ago