Battle of Crécy - A French perspective
Top Comments
All Comments (919)
-
HOLY SHIT!!!, how many archers did the English had in that battle?
-
@mdsaxc02 " one the greatest books ever wrote WAR AND PEACE was about you guess it NAPOLEON."
No it wasn't
-
The Hundred years war wasn't a single conflict but a series of conflicts. There were 3 main phases to the war then small conflicts inbetween them.
Edwardian phase (1337-1380)-- English victory
Caroline phase (1381-1413)--French victory
Lancastrian phase (1414-1453) -- French victory (early English victory).
-
@mdsaxc02 Wellington built his army from less than 10,000 soldiers, his army pioneered the way for modern infantry warfare and did it in a much shorter timespan. Napoleon brought it on himself when he decided to piss off all of Europe at once, AND, it had the 2nd most highly populated country at the time after Russia. Btw i think you should take your keyboard to PC World to get that caps button fixed... then go to your mummy so she can calm your tantrum down.
-
@mdsaxc02 The reason people remember Napoleon is that, after De Gaulle he was the last half-decent person your country produced.... ever. Since then you've been a joke to all of Europe. About the only half-decent thing to come out of France nowerdays is Rothschild. You say the UK is bankrupt? last i heard they weren't the ones being threatened to have their credit rating downgraded and tied into a crashing currency.
-
@Voltaire152 if you went out and ask regular folks who in the fuck is the duke of wellington, they most likey say it's a food dish. EVERYBODY knows of napoleon!!! never made a movie about wellington maybe in england. but there movies on napoleon. one the greatest books ever wrote WAR AND PEACE was about you guess it NAPOLEON. fuck you and when your prince asshole and his slut bankupt your country I laugh because ruling classes are good for one thing, fucking over people weaker than them.
-
@Voltaire152 how many COALITIONS did it take to beat napoleon? do you know what a coaltition is?MORE THAN ONE NATION IDIOT!!! HE HAD TO FIGHT ALL OF EUROPE!!! WEELINGTON COULD HAVE NEVER HAD THAT!!! NAPOLEON BUILD THE GRAND ARMEE FROM SCRATCH!!! AGAIN CHANGE YOUR NAME YOU TRATIOR TO THE FRENCH!!!!!!
-
@mdsaxc02 There is no point winning 1000 battles, then losing the one that costs you the war. That is what Napoleon did. He took the most experienced field army IN THE WORLD with more artillery than had ever been fielded against Wellington using a cobbled together half-green army and lost. Had Wellington been using his army from the Penninsula campaign it would have been an even more thorough victory.
-
@Voltaire152 at leipzig it took a coalition of FOUR countries to beat one army. FOUR!!! so don't give that shit about napoleon. if wellington had took on napoleon by himshelf he would have been destroyed.period so don't bother responding that this point if you do it show your lack of iq, just go to wikipedia type leipzig if don't believe me.
-
@Voltaire152 again there was a french resistance to the german occupation so stop saying that they ALL surrender. isn't voltaire a french guy? at lest change your name to a ENGLISH guy before defending english invaders.without the duke of normandy who was french, there wouldn't have been a edward iii anyway to even START a hurdred years's war. you are nothing without the french. did a english king EVER take over the entire french kingdom? never did!!!
Guess they all took an arrow to the knee...
xXTrueRangerXx 1 month ago 34
Comme Azincourt, encore une bataille où des anglais ont vaincus sans honneur de nobles combattants Français. Dieu est parfois sévère...
L'armée anglaise de ce temps là n'était faites que de chevaucheurs, assassins et voleurs, de pouilleux et de gibiers de potence, sans honneur et envieux à l'image de leur roi, du prestige de la France et de sa beauté. Aujourd'hui, rien n'a changé...
Le monde aurait été bien plus beau sans les anglais.
Votre Dévoué, C.T.C
ClydeTriCanauos 3 weeks ago 2