Does God Exist Debate - UofS: Williamson Cross Examination of Craig

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,067
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 20, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • FINALLY a debate where Craig's opponent engages him on a philosophical level!

    So many of Craig's debates usually wind up with his opponents arrogantly arguing irrelevant points and just making general attacks on religion **cough cough CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS**

    Glad to see that Williamson at least was able to understand Craig's points and argue accordingly.

    And I totally agree with the above comments, Williamson seems like a genuinely nice guy. Even if he is a heathen. ;P

  • Williamson seems like a great guy. One of the better atheists Craig has debated.

see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is what I'm talking about,this is the kind of stuff I've been looking for,not two people just attacking each other and the views the opposing side has,but a gentle,civil conversation on disagreement in worldviews and trying to figure each other out,by asking important and/or difficult questions,and trying to figure out which one of our worldviews makes the most sense. Both of these guys are good examples of how we should talk about these issues

  • ???

  • @raoskaos .... gotcha :)

  • Yes, and you don't subtract infinities!!! It's like trying to divide by zero. Craig's example of "subtracting" infinities is redundant. Hilbert's Paradox stands without this. And THAT is why I said, in the first place, that Craig should shut the fuck up.

  • @raoskaos well, the reason you don't do that is because infinity is an illogical concept in reality, and by subtracting infinite values, Craig further illustrated this point. His whole purpose was to show how illogical an "eternity" of past events is by attempting to bring the concept of an infinite value into every day life and further attempt to use it in situations which would otherwise be logical. So, you're right, you just don't do that.

  • @r10dalegend

    I know that an actual infinite is crazy, but so is god. I was objecting to Craig about subtracting infinities. You don't do that.

  • the reason what he's talking about sounds crazy is because he's trying to show how crazy an actual infinite in reality is :)

  • If there were an infinite number of rooms then there not only would be no vacancies, but there would be no people left to house.

  • I liked Williamson because he kept it real.

    He didn't go off with an air of authority and ideals that brushed with an all knowing attitude and I found his approach to be very down to earth and understandable.

    I also think he made atheists look much better than some of the people who get up in debates as many debaters carry a certain disdain for anything divine or otherwise. And Williamson truly didn't seem concerned with that.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more