Your Seat at the Table
Top Comments
All Comments (144)
-
Elevens...."illegal does not mean illegal." Oh? What exactly does it mean then?
-
mslynn1000, Remember everyone in this country is illegal except for the Natives or First People. Yes, illegal means illegal as long as that part of history is honored that this is a nation of immigrants. Only natives ought to give that label "illegal immigrant", lest we forget history!
-
thats why the catholic church is keen on helping "illegals/undocumented"
-
he is giving medical plan options, not forcing them on anyone. geez, did you even read mccains & obama's plans before you went to the polls???
illegal does not mean illegal, there are refugees in the US who petition the courts for refugee status. some are given and others not, illegal is a label, and far more complex than you can imagine. im not for the illegal entrance of the country, however i am not against the individuals. ITS A VERY COMPLEX ISSUE, you cant paint all with the same brush
-
Why does one get that 'blah, blah, blah' feeling again? Obama believes that he is there 'to maintain the strongest military on the planet.' Given his appointments, an increase in ground forces by 100,000 and $850 billion being spent annually to the miliatry, Sarah Pallin can only become more attractive...Change????
-
wahooo amen you tell em
-
Since I would assume "Christian-based medical coverage" means praying when you get sick, I don't think illegel aliens will affect that right.
-
Great comment khakuda! We deserve this real president-elect Barack Obama---
-
Very realistic and absolutely necessary! Go Obama and his transition team, Americans deserve a seat at the table-especially this table!
Ellie
Transparency is vital and being able to comment, leave messages, and agree or disagree with the teams is wonderful. I am thrilled by this site.
jokill13 3 years ago 3
I am wondering what can be done to truly open the windows to government... While the policy to have materials shared from meetings with 3 or more reps of organizations, this seems to be a loophole for those who will puposely send only TWO representatives to keep the matters private. What can be done to make a more meaningful assessment of what should and should not be shared? Those wishing to keep private their business will most certainly have two reps at White House metings, not 3!
barbarabr53 3 years ago