The video explains current ideas as to how life might have originated on Earth. The idea that inorganic mud can miraculously turn into cells is a claim made in the Bible and the Qu'ran, not science...
The video explains current ideas as to how life might have originated on Earth. The idea that inorganic mud can miraculously turn into cells is a claim made in the Bible and the Qu'ran, not science. What biologists are trying to do is understand how carbon-based chemicals combine to form nucleotides, the building blocks of replicating chemicals. The chemistry is complex, but it's starting to be understood, and it's not magical. Please also see The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis by cdk007 which gives an excellent description on the latest hypotheses about cell formation.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
toobsucker - said "Intelligent design is the only way a complex species can suddenly appear. "
If the first example of a novel creature suddenly materialised on front of us, we might agree. But the Cambrian "explosion" wasn't a brief, mystical event. It was not the spontaneous appearance of multiple novel phyla. Don't mistake the hyperbole for the facts.
There is considerable new evidence of ancestral forms in the Pre-Cambrian fossils. The "explosion" was very slow and had a long fuse.
The Cambrian explosion was the rapid appearance of most major groups of complex animals around 530 million years ago, as evidenced by the fossil record. Paleozoic era, a major division (era) of geologic time occurring between 570 to 240 million years ago. It is subdivided into six periods, the Cambrian Period, and 5 more Periods within the Era.
You don't know what the shit you are talking about. The Cambrian explosion WAS billions of years after the first life. The first life was around 3.5 billion years ago, the Cambrian explosion was about 500,000,000 years ago, so there is a 3 billion year gap between the Cambrian explosion and first life. Dumbass.
And quit thinking that the Cambrian explosion was a literal explosion of new phyla, you little piece of shit. The Cambrian explosion lasted around 65 million years, you fucker.
Again, you're mixing two bowls of soup here. Abiogenesis deals with the formation of life up to unicelular organisms, evolution studies "ready-made" life, as it evolves from a single-cell organism.
I agree that abiogenesis and evolution are interconnected, but they can very well be studied on their own. When studying the composition of a comet in space, does the fact that you don't know how it formed shun away observable evidence that it has x and y chemical elements?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If the first example of a novel creature suddenly materialised on front of us, we might agree. But the Cambrian "explosion" wasn't a brief, mystical event. It was not the spontaneous appearance of multiple novel phyla. Don't mistake the hyperbole for the facts.
There is considerable new evidence of ancestral forms in the Pre-Cambrian fossils. The "explosion" was very slow and had a long fuse.
The first life was The Paleozoic era (544 million years ago) right before Cambrian
But Highly complex phyla appear suddenly with NO traces of ancestry.
This contradicts what the theory predicted
Paleozoic era, a major division (era) of geologic time occurring between 570 to 240 million years ago. It is subdivided into six periods, the Cambrian Period, and 5 more Periods within the Era.
From Wiki "Timeline_of_evolution"
Between 4500 and 3500 Ma (Ma=MILLION)The earliest life appears, possibly derived from self-reproducing RNA molecules.
Go look it up and stop deceiving yourself
Okay, what, asshole? The first life is 4500 to 3500 Ma, so that was on par with what I said, asshole. 3500 Ma is 3.5 billion years ago, you dumb shit.
3,500 x 1,000,000 = 3,500,000,000. Can't do math, you stupid dickwad?
And quit thinking that the Cambrian explosion was a literal explosion of new phyla, you little piece of shit. The Cambrian explosion lasted around 65 million years, you fucker.
You need to research it more.
Darwinian evolution starts at a single celled ancestor. and all species alive come from it.
Darwin did NOT believe any intelligence created the single cell. he believed it evolved by chance. he stated this in a letter to a colleague.
I agree that abiogenesis and evolution are interconnected, but they can very well be studied on their own. When studying the composition of a comet in space, does the fact that you don't know how it formed shun away observable evidence that it has x and y chemical elements?