samsung hmx u10 vs. Kodak zi8 : low level conclusion
Uploader Comments (fishycomics)
Top Comments
-
The U10 is slightly better than the Kodak.. I know it doesn't perform under low light levels but it has better sound quality and movement is less blurred, I know this from experience as I've bought both camcorders and have preferred the U10 because it's better quality outdoors, I never used the camcorders at night or in dark places because I'm a free runner and I'm always outside in the afternoon light as hell so there's no need... and look at the prices (Kodak: £119.99 vs U10: £79.99)
Video Responses
All Comments (116)
-
Samsung UX10 is terrible in any kind of low light conditions. Actually, you would be better getting a piece of black paper and filming that, as it would be more clearer than the UX10!
-
1. Get Drunk
2. Make a review of two cameras
3.Get arrested for being weird
4.???
5.PROFiT
-
?
-
if i saw you in the park that night i would've walked the other way.
-
Thanks for the review! good one!
-
@SuperMrRain thank you
-
any way i can see ur video quality is pretty good , even though its under low lights + class 2 mini card , this unbelevable O_O
-
yes I know its U10 not U20 which make the case more crazier for me , I am using U20, so it supposed to be much better than U10 , u can chek my channel to see how the video quality is very poor specialy in low light , but it looks pretty good in sun lights , u said its because the way i am shooting , ok can u explain how this effects the video quality , thanks for answering.
U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 NEXT U10 VS PM5
JAYMEIV 10 months ago 2
@JAYMEIV send one my way and will will will.
fishycomics 10 months ago