87 Supra Vs 91 Camaro

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
28,748
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 28, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (alphawerefox)

  • Both of these cars are gone forever and prolly crushed to nothing. May they both rest in pieces lol ~Owner of video

  • Doesn't the owner of this Supra live inn like Schnecksville,Pa area?

  • @caos285 That car is dead now, sold it over a year ago and the 19 yr old kid blew it up.

  • yea but too bad my supra is completely stock with 102k miles. my bros v8 camaro has modifications done to it but he said he's apparently having fuel issues.

Top Comments

  • supra for life

see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even an NA mk3 should beat a 305 camaro easy. btw either are 4600lbs lol both are about the same +/- 100-200lbs or so. I like them both, too =)

  • @alphawerefox sad face ,parts!!!

  • @kushasweets it was born a 89 N/A, i put a ct26 and swapped to a R154 tranny and of course your normal bolt ons. but im appalled that this guy would say a mk3 is 4600lbs... unless hes blind and driving a dualy!

  • @kueseng where are you getting your numbers for weight... the fact that you have to make yourself bigger than the other guy.. HEY GUYS MY SUPRA WEIGHS 3400LBS. IDK WTF THIS GUY IS TALKING ABOUT. yes heavy still but no production mk3 will weigh 4600lbs you just have a small dick and a big mouth

  • @radmaxxxx what are you basing that on? your stupidity? or your lack of vehicle knowledge? take your pick

  • @alohawarefox just because its blown up dosent mean its dead. Replacing an engine is a simple job. I've pulled the engine out of my 91 turbo more times than I care to count

  • @wkeil1981 true...but high 14s in a quarter mile aint bad :)

  • N/A MkIII's came with 4.10's in the rear stock (turbo's were 3.90s 86-88 3.70s 89-92...........that helps alot especially when camaros only came with 3.08-3.42s in the rear . MKIII's weight was 3600-3850 depending on targa or non targa top, 5 speed or automatic, turbo or non turbo.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more