87 Supra Vs 91 Camaro
Uploader Comments (alphawerefox)
Top Comments
-
supra for life
All Comments (49)
-
Even an NA mk3 should beat a 305 camaro easy. btw either are 4600lbs lol both are about the same +/- 100-200lbs or so. I like them both, too =)
-
@alphawerefox sad face ,parts!!!
-
@kushasweets it was born a 89 N/A, i put a ct26 and swapped to a R154 tranny and of course your normal bolt ons. but im appalled that this guy would say a mk3 is 4600lbs... unless hes blind and driving a dualy!
-
@kueseng where are you getting your numbers for weight... the fact that you have to make yourself bigger than the other guy.. HEY GUYS MY SUPRA WEIGHS 3400LBS. IDK WTF THIS GUY IS TALKING ABOUT. yes heavy still but no production mk3 will weigh 4600lbs you just have a small dick and a big mouth
-
@radmaxxxx what are you basing that on? your stupidity? or your lack of vehicle knowledge? take your pick
-
@alohawarefox just because its blown up dosent mean its dead. Replacing an engine is a simple job. I've pulled the engine out of my 91 turbo more times than I care to count
-
@wkeil1981 true...but high 14s in a quarter mile aint bad :)
-
N/A MkIII's came with 4.10's in the rear stock (turbo's were 3.90s 86-88 3.70s 89-92...........that helps alot especially when camaros only came with 3.08-3.42s in the rear . MKIII's weight was 3600-3850 depending on targa or non targa top, 5 speed or automatic, turbo or non turbo.
Both of these cars are gone forever and prolly crushed to nothing. May they both rest in pieces lol ~Owner of video
alphawerefox 5 months ago
Doesn't the owner of this Supra live inn like Schnecksville,Pa area?
caos285 8 months ago
@caos285 That car is dead now, sold it over a year ago and the 19 yr old kid blew it up.
alphawerefox 8 months ago 5
yea but too bad my supra is completely stock with 102k miles. my bros v8 camaro has modifications done to it but he said he's apparently having fuel issues.
alphawerefox 2 years ago