Scottish Elections - Royalist fascist Salmond

Peter Dow's website - http://scot.tk
For Freedom Forums - http://figh.tk
Alex Salmond (SNP) declares against both a free Scottish parliament and a democratically elected head of state for Scotland. 26 April 2007.

Questioned on BBC Radio Scotland by Peter Dow, Alex Salmond leader of the Scottish National Party denied the democratic rights of the Scots to have all their elected Members of the Scottish Parliament actually allowed in the parliament building and debating chamber at all times and not undemocratically excluded as was done to 4 SSP MSPs for a whole month.

Further, Salmond denied the rights of the Scots to elect our head of state and not have the Queen imposed upon us by a royalist, fascist constitution from hell.

Well, Alex Salmond - as the royalist, fascist lackey that he is - may not wish to complain about being excluded from the British parliament for a week that one time. If Salmond wished merely to grin and bear his own exclusion then that was a matter for him and for those who elect him to come to a view about.

However, Salmond shows his royalist, fascist colours and is quite wrong when he seems to say to others, such as the four Scottish Socialists MSPs who were excluded,

"listen ye canny whine and moan about being punished for it. That's just daft"

By which I presume Salmond means the 4 excluded MSPs
http://scot.bravehost.com/omp.htm?h=scottishrepublicannews2005

did not have solid grounds for complaint. Salmond is wrong. Any MSP has democratic constitutional grounds for complaint about being excluded as any such exclusion is an attack on their democratic right to be in the Scottish parliament as they were elected to be. An MSP's right to be in parliament cannot properly be voted away by a majority vote of the parliament - such a vote cannot overturn the constitutional right to be in parliament which an elected MSP has.
http://scot.bravehost.com/omp.htm?h=scotlandscommandauthority

What is more, it doesn't just end at complaining. The MSPs are entitled to look to the state to take legal or military action to defend their right to enter parliament - and the head of state has a duty to enforce that right. Any head of state, like the Queen, who fails to enforce that right has failed in their duties to defend the members of a free parliament as head of state in a most treacherous way and would be subject to impeachment and removal proceedings if there were any established procedures for doing this.

As under the UK's constitution from hell, there are no established procedures for removing the Queen, (though King Charles I was found guilty of treason and beheaded) ultimately the excluded MSPs are entitled to make a direct appeal and issue their own order to the Scottish military to remove the Queen, by military arrest, exclusion from Scotland and ultimately, if all else fails, assassination of the Queen. I would argue that such an order from a member of parliament can have some constitutional validity in democratic theory because in the absence of a full and free parliament of all elected members, legitimate command authority might be assumed by some to be properly (though somewhat dangerously) derogated to individual elected members of parliament!

So potentially, there is a bit more to it than merely to "whine and moan" about being an excluded MSP! Indeed, the Queen could get a bit more than being shunned if she is not careful! After all, the IRA did a bit more than shun "Lord Mountbatten of Burma", the Queen's relative, when the IRA assassinated Mountbatten!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten%2C_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma
If that was "shunning" Mountbatten then yes we should shun the Queen!

Royalist lackey Salmond can grin and bear it while Scotland is on its knees to the Queen if he wishes. Scottish republicans should never just "grin and bear it" when our rights are violated. We should fight to defend our rights.

I've written a website for Scottish republican political education - my Scottish National Standard Bearer website
http://scot.bravehost.com/

Discuss on the For Freedom Forums
http://scot.bravehost.com/youtubecomment.htm

The functions and duties of a Scottish National Standard Bearer
http://scot.bravehost.com/omp.htm?h=functionsofbearer

90+ more videos by Peter Dow here -
Peter Dow TV - Join This Viewers Group
http://uk.youtube.com/groups_videos?name=pdviewers

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Scottish
• Scotland
• elections
• SNP
• Alex
• Salmond
• SSP
• parliament
• royalist
• fascist
• police
• state
• freedom

[Earthlinggb]

Alex talks hypocritical shit. He KNOWS why he needs to keep the monarchy but he's just not telling the scottish people the truth. He should have his arse kicked out of this country. Secondly, he felt justified in his challenge to authority did he? It would have to be said (though he would refuse to acknowledge it being the little prat he is) that anyone would RIGHTLY be pissed off at being PUNISHED by "authority" for challenging that "authority". He's illegitimate and a liar.

[ScottishRepublican]

@Earthlinggb Neither the Scots nor the Britons NEED the monarchy. It is imposed upon us and most are brainwashed to like the Queen etc by the state broadcasting (BBC etc) endlessly promoting the royals.

Salmond should certainly have his arsed kicked out of Bute House and the Scottish government but we should leave the Scottish voters to kick him out of the Scottish parliament which republican broadcasting could encourage.

It is the Queen's arse which needs to be kicked out of this country.

[ScottishRepublican]

@Earthlinggb You are invited to discuss Salmond's treachery etc in the For Freedom Forums, for robust political debate, inspired by Scots, open to all at FIGH.TK

[cameranzo1]

@ScotishRepublican Who do you think will win in the scotish elections this year? I think the SNP will, you?

[ScottishRepublican]

@cameranzo1 I think the Queen will win and the Scots will lose for the simple reason that the elections will be rigged by the kingdom's control of broadcasting which will only allow those loyal to the Queen on TV to any great extent.

The Queen will certainly win if the SNP win because the SNP under Salmond have a unionist policy of keeping Scotland subjugated under the union crown, united kingdoms and retaining the Queen as head of state.

Unless the Queen dies 1st then King Charles'll win

[ScottishRepublican]

@cameranzo1 Therefore although free and fair elections would be "Scottish" elections, because the elections are going to be rigged against the Scots the rigged elections will actually be "anti-Scottish" not "Scottish".

[inkstersco]

Describing Salmond, of all people, as "royalist fascist" sounds a bit head-up-arse. Salmond is acquiescent to royalty, because his priority is Scottish separation, and wants to draw support from royalists and republicans alike. If Salmond is a fascist, then all I can say is that almost all world politicians are fascists and the word loses all meaning.

[malcolmsh]

The Declaration of Arbroath devoutly defends the Divine Right of Kings, it simply adds a caveat about the right of Scots to oust a monarch early and replace a suitable person from the line of succession. It in no way advocates republicanism.

[QuietReckoning]

As an American, I'm as constitutionally republican as peter. The only reason people liked the royal wedding is because it was a spectacle. We think shiny things are really cool. If you got rid of the queen, we'd find other shiny things to occupy ourselves. My personal perspective is that my great great great great grandfather didn't die in the mud so that his descendants could swoon over the royal family. But there is a question of what's politically possible, isn't there? What say you, Scots?

[NumberDne]

@49wignell "prosper economically on her own.Ireland has"

I do believe you have made a quite massive error of judgment here. Ireland's economy is decimated. Scotland's economy is going strong and is quite safe within the union.

[ScottishRepublican]

@wo0fuk I am Peter Dow, ScottishRepublican, the guy asking the question in this radio phone-in programme and "everyone in Scotland" is not as aggressive as I am, neither are the two Queen's Scottie lap dogs, Salmond and Robertson, speaking in this video.

The "UK" means the kingdom, not us, not all of the people. The UK is a state, ruled by few not the many.

The UK & crown keeps us together only in chains and subjugation, we would be stronger breaking free to come to each other's aid.

[wo0fuk]

Jesus, why is everyone in Scotland so aggressive? We're all UK. Let's keep it that way! Stronger together, weaker apart.