Don't forget ....

Song : http://www.deezer.com/listen-3122230

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• nucléaire
• bombe
• centrale
• atomique
• nuclear
• power
• station
• tchernobyl
• flo
• bart
• ultravox
• bomb
• dancing
• atomic
• explosion

[TrolloftheTube]

@Ackbar60

That's not the issue. The issue is, that ONE nuclear disaster is more than 10x worse than any Hydroelectric could ever be.

[ErikHartog]

@BrianDavid79 Even at night solar energy works, it doesn't matter if there are clouds. By the way: Biogasses are not fossil, so don't blame me @ that.

14 kills in 14.000 reactor years? Haha, that's ridiculous. Only from Chernobyl, more then 4000 people died of cancer ED.

Second problem: the uranium is exhausted in 50 years

Third problem: How do you want to guarantee that the nuclear waste will be stored safe for 400,000 years?

[samuel90100]

Military nuclear and civil nuclear are not the same thing =P Stupid ecologist ^^

[mphello]

@mrphipps360 Great. Wonderful. A power plant cannot explode. Now tell us something we don't know.

Windmills also do NOT kill loads of birds.

[mphello]

@BrianDavid79 Where do you pull up bullshit likes like that?

[mphello]

@BrianDavid79 Stupid comparison between cars vs nuclear power -

unless you've got nuclear-powered cars to compare to oil-powered cars.

Then that would make a reasonable comparison.

[mphello]

@CPTownage567 You're a fucking shithead if you think that strawman is why anti-nuclear activists oppose the colossal insanity and drain on an economy that nuclear power is.

[teac4444]

@mphello Sorry mate, you are and amazing asshole and idiot!! I dont even know why I waste time with you. I will continue my research and IT will continue, you can cry to your mama. Nuclear energy is here to stay and it cannot be replaced by wind or solar, who says otherwise is just plain stupid and know nothing about grid or physics involved in such technology

[teac4444]

@mphello Dear boy. I work in nuclear RESEARCH you IDIOT!!! And I have studied power engineering and nuclear engineering. I studied about wind and solar energy(i also did scientific projects with PV cells).I know more than you think! I have studied in Canada,Slovakia and Netherlands.

And how do you propose to limit breeding?

You cannot what??Nuclear reactors are also build by private companies, but LAW tell they have to be insured and controled by government. Have you heard of IAEA???

[mphello]

@teac4444 Listen, boy: FACT: you have never worked in the nuclear industry and you do NOT have any engineering credentials.

Fact: stupid hippies know more about nuclear power than you know about wind and solar energy.

"cannot limit breeding". Bullshit. Why not?

Fact: you CANNOT build nuclear reactors by private companies and insured by private industry. All the costs and waste are paid for and forced onto the public. Not practical.

[teac4444]

@mphello Buddy, Wind and solar energy will never by able to sub for coal,gas,water or nuclear. It is way too unreliable and it costs fortune to minimize inpact. you also dont have so much space to build it.it is very costly. Only reliable renewable source is tidal power.you can predict rides to 150years.Other concept will maybe supply parts of small houses and so on. And you cannot limit breeding. you just cannot

[mphello]

@teac4444

= Radioactive parts of dismanteled NP will be stored for about 100 years and after that they can be reused.=

But to do everything you just said requires dong more work, and hence requiring more energy, faster than the energy you can get out.

And, no - I do NOT believe Helen Caldicott is right about everything regarding the risks of radiation.