9/11 Explosion In The North Tower Before The Plane Hit - Eyewitness
Top Comments
All Comments (67)
-
well done never seen this before,i bet lucifer has special plans for george bush' arse when he arrives in the rape dungeon
-
The government are sick fucks, anyone who is responsible for this should be hung from a tree for having their people endure this pain and suffering.
-
@ZachIsARuhtard One day we will see who the disgrace truly is... And you will see even educated , smart, people can be fooled at their own trades...You disregard the testimony of those 1st res ponders who witnessed huge explosion BEFORE the planes hit...you also disregard the thermite found on site..the lack of investigation protocol with the evidence, the explosions seen on video, building 7 falling at freefall speed with a video confession of its owner saying he pulled the building...disgrace
-
1:38 wow are those dead bodies by the truck?
-
@ZachIsARuhtard You are also blocked because your comments are made up tales that are a waste of people time, go find an annoying orange video to debate science on.
-
@ZachIsARuhtard Jet fuel is stabilized and does not burn hotter than 600 degrees in air without oxygen assist. Period.
-
The buildings were NOT heated or damaged below the fires, the buildings 32 times stronger, graduated in strength and construction. Why do we see no slowing as the load bearing strength gets stronger and stronger all the way to grade. You would have dynamic loading, according to the third law of motion, causing a slowing in gravitational acceleration. All that dust creation comes at a cost of energy. 2nd law of motion, which would be a slowing. 10 and 11 seconds collapses to dust? Physics says no
-
@ZachIsARuhtard Now come back to earth and describe everything you said using REAL fire chemistry and the phase change FACT of steel. Please describe the phase change properties of steel and the temp set points. Then describe how your steel, which is alloyed, not base Fe-Fe-C, was able to change its properties under those set points to reduce its load bearing capacity by more than 5%? I want to hear it in your words .... I can easily give my case for everything I claim with solid proven science
-
NIST tried to recreate your fires and they were unable to get past the fire tetrahedron. Either they needed more oxygen, fuel, or heat to accomplish anything you claim. See the freeburn tests. The fires were isolated and mostly smoke with small dull red-orange diffuse flame. If you knew what you were talking about you would be able to look at what you are seeing and understand. Steel is VERY thermally conductive, and has very high thermal mass, as well as heat resistant to very high temps
-
I am an engineer, a PE. I specialize in fire, combustion, heat, building thermal loads, materials science, etc. I can tell you for a scientific fact steel retains its same bo\x crystal structure, the molecular formation that gives it its strength and properties until 1330 degrees. I can also tell you for a fact the fires were poorly combusted and that a poorly combusted fire fails to convert the C (fuel) into Co2 in the chemistry. Without that conversion you get 30 percent heat potential max.
What the fuck? I never saw this on American news. Gee I wonder why. lol.
SheepAsleepWakeUp 1 year ago 18
@hceggeberth I like the caveman in the Himalays theory, it seems so much more real than the fact that the buildings turned to cauliflower dust formations that dispersed sub-400 micron dust inches thick all over Manhattan with loud explosion noises. Since two 110 story buildings fell into themselves in 10 seconds each, this man's explosion account makes far more sense than the building collapsed from fire. I have enough video proof to back his story, many times over. Excuses are over.
IranContraScumDid911 1 year ago 12