cammed 5.0 vs sts turbo lt1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,905
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 17, 2008

cammed 5.0 w/ boltons + stock heads

lt1 trans am with sts turbo..3-4psi, untuned.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (dre2013)

  • thats not a boosted TA. thats pretty much what would happen with a minor mod TA vs. a cam fox body. some people on here have way to high image of a cammed 5.0. its not that great. cam a 5.0 and it has pretty much the stock hp of an LT1. sorry guys buut its true. and sts turbo cars are super super loud and guess what didnt hear a thing. if i had a slow 5.0 that had a cam and got beat by a TA like that i would say it had a turbo too

  • @BradFresh21

    ...why the hell would i lie about it? as ive said 500 FUCKIN TIMES it was running 3psi off the wastegate, untuned with stock injectors, and had 4 exhaust leaks. with an STS turbo an exhaust leak = boost leaks. the kit had just been installed the night before. he ended up turning the boost up after getting tuned, and then the motor blew. He finally smartend up and bought an ls1 z28.

  • This video was taken in Barberton OH. That is a pretty sweet firebird. Are you in the Mustang?

  • @KOOBAZI

    yea we were in the stang

  • yeah had to be stock to stock. a stock lt1 will walk off on a 5.0 like that.

  • @ltx94

    get off the rock.

Top Comments

  • Dont think the transam was even turboed

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @KOOBAZI - Right on. You can even see the Fred Martin sign.

  • Gotta love the Trans Am.

  • @dre2013 Don't worry bro, these gm wackos are stubborn as a bitch. We all know the truth though. Don't waste your time on fucking kids.

  • @dre2013 im talking NA Ford motors, not the supercharged 4.6 terminator engine, that motor is a thing of beauty

  • @dre2013 "smartend up"? lol. sounds like you need to smarten up and get rid of that slow piece of shit fox. LT1 is still a better motor than anything ford had to offer prior to the new 5.0

  • @dre2013 what exactly happen to the trans am here after the tune. I know an lt1 can be stronger than an ls1 just because of the cast iron factor. The lt1 must have had to much boost for stock internals ,a lot of miles, or both.

  • putting a cam in stock 302 with e7 heads is useless. probly makes less power under the curve than with the stock cam. another dumbass who wants his stock mustang to sounds good but have 0 sac. I have a mildly built 351w with world products heads in my 87 fox. My cam has less valve overlap than the one in the vid. I once crushed a kids lt1 when i had 3 other people in my car. Thats another 550-600 lbs btw

  • @dre2013

    You're an idiot, you ricer homo...

  • @svtmotorman A stock LT1 will RUN off and leave any stock 79 - 05 GT stang....any. It won't just walk them. I own a 5.0 and quite a few LT1s so before you put your foot in your mouth...don't. Heck, I own a 97 SHO that walks all over 5.0 GTs.

    5.0 is a good motor but it ain't nothing compared to an LT1.

  • morons

    

  • @svtmotorman excuse me my apology ....it was indeed a fox and not a sn-95

  • @ltx94 hahahahaa ya right .....a ls1 makes stock 79-2005 stangs look bad ......a wack ass lt1 aint walking a 5.0 5speed stock vs stock ........and if that thing was boosted and thats all the faster it pulled even with only 3 psi then wow thats one fast stang

  • @dre2013 hahahahaha then why even go beat on the car?....that was the dumbest thing iv heard this week ......and second if thats all the faster that thing pulled on only a "cammed" 5.0 then hahahaha ur shit is wack .......do your self a favor ....sell all that lt1 junk and throw a ls1 in it .......hahhaahahaha i dont care 3 lbs is 3lbs ....hahahahahhaaa.....the stang at 1st glance even looks like a sn-95 heavy bastard at that

  • dude with the lt1 fuck you i mean really dude you spent all that money on rear mount turbos that lag like a fuck when you could have spent at the most 350 for a cam and got the same or more hp! IF your not a dumb ass witch you must be cuz you got that sts bull shit. You should have killed him with no turbos sorry dude you got fucked should have bought a real turbo kit sts is junk 5.0 guy get some GOOD heads and intake and and a better cam and you will blow this guy away ez shit dude

  • @QuickSSilver98 Maybe if you had an STS turbo you would know that most f-body guys and even corvette guys use the "other" exhaust pipe and tie it into the blow off on the turbo!

  • I live 1 mile from there, next exit is Cleveland Mass.

  • ha as always the f-bodys in front;)

  • @mgbadboyz  Not hearing it isn't the only reason I don't think its turboed lol. Those old 5.0 stangs are so SLOW lol. I don't care if its cammed or w/e they r slow and thats how it shoulda beat it stock by atleast that much.

  • @MEADOWSracing78 its 3-4 psi.. ur not going to hear a turbo with that little boost.

  • @black93z28camaro he said 3-4 psi on boost.. ur not going to hear that.

  • @ltx94 yea cause u cant even hear the turbo

  • @ltx94 agreed been there done that...

  • @ltx94 you smokin crack er sumtin

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more