New Iranian Attack Helicopter Shahed 285

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
79,773
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 24, 2009

New Iranian Attack Helicopter Shahed 285 with 2 variants Naval & Ground
Iran Military, Iran Navy, Iran Air Force, Iran, IRGC, sepah vs Israel Military, Artesh
Iranian Aircraft, Helicopters, New Helicopters

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (412)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks like a bell Ranger, single power plant and not capable of carrying a decent load of munitions. No optics. I hope it at least has a ejection seat.... LOL

  • this was filmed on an iranian made potato

  • i think it used to be called Bill and it was american before the iranians changed its colors and name!

  • @EagleMarine2012 If the classmate has been in class for a few centuries, the best way for the newcomer to learn might be to learn from what the first one found out. Don't you agree? :D

  • @EagleMarine2012 You were indeed ahead of the soviets :D though i doubt you could outmuscle them. Their airforce was inferior, but on land they are the stronger.

    What iran is producing now, is mostly outdated weaponry or stuff of little use. But considering it's only been 30 years since they started doing research for their own.. i think they're doing great :) The US has been at it since it's creaton, you've got a hell of a head start on em

  • @EagleMarine2012 The US, like the germans and the soviets did alot of research into Hydrogen bombs and nuclear technology. And you did in fact produce the first atomic bomb.

    But lord knows what would have happened if the germans had managed to survive for another year, they had a hell of alot of weapons near completion

  • @EagleMarine2012 Well.. do you know what "heavy water" is? :) The germans produced it and had heavy water plants in scandinavia etc etc, i did not say the US tech was primitive or "next to nothing", the US was a very advanced nation. They just got a hell of a boost from captured tech and scientists. You might have invented the first liquid fueled rocket, but the germans had the V1 and V2 and had designed ballistic missiles, jetfighters, etc etc

  • @EagleMarine2012 Simple.. you didn't beat them technologically.. not at all :) When the US landed in France, Germany had already been fighting for 5 years against a multitude of nations, 3/4th of their armies were stationed on the eastern front, and although German tech was superior, the US and Soviet tanks were present in greater numbers and were much easier to produce and maintain, your troops were fresh, your fighters heavily armored,... etc :)

  • @Soulspire but unlike the soviets we already were ahead in the wonder weapons race, Our ww2 deadly vehicles like the b-29 and the b-17( which was raining hell fire on the German war industrial machine), the military jeep, gyro helicopter(end of the war) was all our developments with no Nazi help. But what Iran and Israel are doing right now is plainly copying or slightly modifying our designs like a kid that would copy form his classmate during a test.

  • @Soulspire haha china is the master of steal-imitations they have been using this trick ever since( we certainly have a common ground there) But how the hell could have we beat the Germans technologically if our own was primitive and next to nothing? We were the ones how invented the first ever liquid fueled rocket and the atomic bomb... I do know America did abduct Nazi scientists and engineers to help gather information to build better and improved models of the jet.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more