Pull it WTF is Silverstein talkin' about?!
Uploader Comments (911MmRy)
All Comments (88)
-
this is getting boring now.
"pull it" and "demolition" are used throughout the documentary interchangeably.
"pull it" IS slang for demolition! its is a slang term! there are no hard and fast rules.
YOU miss out the part where they say "we had to be careful about how we DEMOLISHED building 6..."
-
this video is total BS Disinfo.
-
"Pull Them Outta D'buildin....is WAY different from "Pullit"....... Ya it was SOOO sad, they HAD to PULLIT and Larry got what?? 6 Billion??? What I like best is Silversteins little SMIRK...Lettin us little people know
how funny it is RIPPIN us off for 6 Billion......Like there's somethin we could do [ONCE THE FIX IS IN] to stop, expose the CRIME..... We are a joke, so easy to fool us...Jus follow d'money...but then what?
Hey Larry, you win...It's O.K. 4U 2 laugh at US..
We let U get over.
-
Well, it does prove that bldg 6 was NOT "pulled by explosives" as the misleading claim in some CT Youtube videos such as 9/11 Mysteries and Loose Change claim.
If you can't even take that out of it, and can't even deal with any facts then I'm not really sure what you think you are debating
-
Gee, no CT's responded to your challenge, I wonder why?
-
LMAO wow... u are one complete ignorant dumb son of a bitch....
wake up and do some real homework.
this video proves nothing.
-
"Because you don't even bother to read a reputable paper"
I am still waiting for one single document from you. The only thing you linked so far was a YouTube video that was removed for copyright.
Feel free to private message me with any links literature on this subject, or provide links to the multiple claims you have yet to substantiate. Until then, I will save you the burden of threatening to end the conversation.. because I am ending it.
I anxiously await the URLs via private message.
-
As you have with every video link, search, and point I have made.
Let's just cut to the chase. I don't have the time nor inclination to argue with you.
Your mind is made up and you have no desire to get to the truth.
You couldn't find a piece of coal on a white floor if it had a Neon sign above it saying "COAL THIS WAY" - why should I try to educate you in science?
-
1993 has everything to do with 9/11. The 1993 explosives were provided by the government. The attack was allowed to happen.
And I am well aware of how engineers work. You might ask why that despite the requirements of the NFPA code to test for thermate in any building collapse, that the government refused to do so in violation of law, and despite finding evidence of evaporated steel?
"I'm not aware of one time when..."
Your ignorance does not make it true or false.
-
I post a link and all you can do is make ad hominem - why should I have expected more from you?
So far you haven't the ability to do the simple homework to see that I was absolutely correct about the Cheney painting ships issue, as well as every other claim I have made, and why?
Because you don't even bother to read a reputable paper - all you do is scour debunking sites, hoping to pass off your gleaned "information" as wisdom.
I've been in science longer than you've been alive.
If Larry Silverstein was talking about removing firefighters, he would have said the decision was made to pull THEM. Since the building was supported by only 3 major columns, it would have been relatively easy to use a crane to pull one of the columns and cause the building to collapse.
We know as fact he was not talking about firefighters, because as Popular Mechanics has stated "There were no firefighting efforts in WTC7"
and "by 11:30 no firefighters were in the building" - US State Dept.
antiklaus 3 years ago
"Since the building was supported by only 3 major columns, it would have been relatively easy to use a crane to pull one of the columns and cause the building to collapse."
and an explosion of a fuel tank like the police has stated couldn't have caused the collapse why?
911MmRy 3 years ago