The Physics of Starship Battles: Gravity and Potential Energy
Uploader Comments (SpreadingtheMuse)
All Comments (240)
-
I have to say, though, I don't think they'd need to even bother with this much. If their technology is so advanced, all they really have to do is study our biology and then develop a biological weapon to destroy us. No damage to the planet itself, but humanity is either completely obliterated or left so devastated that mopping us up will be a breeze.
-
I love this little briefing/tongue lashing on mass drivers from Mass Effect 2.
"This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space!"
-
The bad guys used an Asteroid in The Last Starfighter to blast the Starfighter home base.
-
@aarontaylor94 and liquefy the crust the energy is say light is the constant is dependant on the mass of the object inquestion you can be a atom at the speed of light and not dent a single thing, your a astroid at the same speed and youll annihilate whatever you touch, back to the original, the light photon is the atom and the astroid i mentioned is the other larger object it is. remember E=MC^2 M is mass
-
@aarontaylor94 lets see, take your peble at the speed of light the impact if it occurs avoiding atmospheric burn up would create little change to the south pole and would have its presence soon erased the speed of light remains our current energy, now say you made the pebble a small boulder or large it would create a sizable impact radius, imagine a space ship moving at the speed of light carrying heavy metal balls that would crash into earth then it would make a crater all the way to the core
-
So, what then? Use many smaller meteorites to wipe us out? Not only is that even more dangerous and expensive to do, but they wouldn't be able to wipe out humanity in it's entirety, lest they do irrevertable damage to Earth.
Therefore, smaller craft and/or vehicles and/or infantry is needed to finish the job.
-
Then, there is the question about whether or not they want the environment intact. Hardly any planets out there has a developed ecosystem ready to be lived in. Terraforming is expensive. It requires both time and resources.
Therefore, if the aliens want it as a home, they can't afford to use a large meteorite to wipe us out, for it would take millions of years for life to recover.
-
I find that meteors to be too...inefficient. There is the inherent danger of dragging them out of an astroid belt. They are needed to be slowed down (because they are moving quite fast there), while the ship doing so would be in constant danger of being slammed into by the various other meteorites.
Than there is the problem of bringing it to a planet. Would they spend extra energy to launch it from it's current location, or spend energy bringing it to Earth's pull?
Why would they even bother with us?
Clearly we are retarded showing film after film of killing "their kind" and being hostile toward them. If they have the ability to build ships they damn well have the ability to watch our broadcasts and see what a nasty species we really are.
If they ever were to come to Earth one of us would surely try and kill them (as hollywood and our xenophobic ways have trained us to do). we kill one of them, they destroy our entire race. (possibly a good thing)
Myro117 1 month ago 2
@Myro117 One reason we've lasted as long as we have is that I think that they DONT care about us. There's so many habitable planets that they cant be bothered to invade every single one
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago