KISS LP 1970's TV Commercials Pt.1

Vintage TV commercials for the KISS albums ROCK AND ROLL OVER, LOVE GUN and ALIVE 2.

Category:

Music

Tags:

• KISS
• Alive
• Love
• Gun
• Rock
• 70's

[JxT1957]

in 1973 i was 16 i bought kiss first album, and then came hotter than hell, then i thought this is the baddest rock band on the planet

[YamahaYzBoodley]

god i grew up in the wrong decade

[younandotube666]

@brute017 yes it s pity but KISS is dying because Gene just thinks about money and not MUSIC...

[brute017]

@younandotube666 I agree - sonic boom sounds more like sonic bust. Psycho circus barely had enough good songs. Paul's solo album sounds like a weak part two to his 78 solo album. Gene's last solo sucked big time. They are out of ideas, they have put on the same concert since 98. They just play shows to line their pockets and as for Ace's replacement - who gave the ok for that loser to wear Ace's make up? Oh yea, Gene. Who is so far out of touch form reality it is no longer funny

[younandotube666]

New KISS has no balls... No power, no good solos, no good rhythms... KISS Sonic Boom is weak, no real good song, just two old men playing...

[ForceMaximus84]

0:46 Shannon Tweed?

[RevkahJC]

@AngelofAnguish I agree that KISS now sounds very different to the KISS of the 70's. When you remove original members from any band it changes the tone and sound. With the Stones, Keith Richards and Mick Jagger have been the lead singers for over 44 years. In KISS the fact that two of their key singers are gone DOES make a difference to the sound. My point was more that as singers age their vocal chords change.

[AngelofAnguish]

@RevkahJC I agree-to an extent. HOWEVER, in my opinion, KISS and the Rolling Stones play TOTALLY DIFFERENT TYPES OF MUSIC. Yes, it's "rock music," IN GENERAL, BUT, in my opinion, KISS play "HEAVY rock" or "metal" and the Rolling Stones play "TRADITIONAL rock." In my opinion, KISS' music has a "heavier" or "harder" edge to it. Since Ace and Peter are NOT in KISS, I hope KISS REALLY DO "CALL IT QUITS!" In my opinion, their music sounds REALLY slow and SOUND NOTHING LIKE THE ORIGINALS!

[RevkahJC]

The Stones still do concerts and they are as old (if not older) then KISS. Helloooo...when people get older their vocal cords change thus their voices change. Nobody sounds like they did when they were 20-30 when they are 60-65. Perhaps when you grow up you'll understand that. 

[cranie4]

@bgj150 They should stop. You think they are doing it for you? Maybe back in the day but now it's all about the $. I saw them 3 times during the reunion tours and the first show was AMAZING.... and by the third time around (After Paul's Phantom gig) they were tired and his voice was shot. It was LESS than the best show they've put on and that's NOT what they were originally about. It was them going through the motions.

[bgj150]

@cranie4 NO WAY IN THE WORLD SHOULD THEY STOP...I DEF DO AGREE THEY SHOULDVE PUT THE OTHER 2 IN ACE'S AND PETERS MAKE UP...BUT AS A GROUP THEY SHOW NO SIGNS OF THEM SLOWING DOWN OR GETTING OLD IN GENERAL...TRUST ME ON THAT I SAW THEM 13 TIMES IN CONCERT,AND THE LAST 2 TIMES I SAW THEM THEY WERE BETTER THAN EVER.... NO BAND IN THE WORLD AIMS 2 PLEASE OR PUTS ON A BETTER SHOW THAN THESE GUYS......NO ONE...