British broadcaster Sir David Attenborough presents his views on Charles Darwin, natural selection, and how the Bible has put the natural world in peril in an exclusive interview for Nature Video.
To celebrate Darwin's bicentenary Nature is also providing selected content FREE online, including continuously updated news, research and analysis on Darwin's life, his science and his legacy.
Visit: www.nature.com/darwin
@o1ooo1o No other teaching has survived longer than Christian teaching. We still believe a Savior (God) was born of a woman just like God told Adam and Eve.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o Christians today still believe that Only our Maker, Himself, in person is able to remake us again because there is no one else who can.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o Christianity has not changed from the first day that God told Adam and Eve that a Savior (God) would be born of a woman.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o Learning does not entail evolving. Evolving does not exist.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o That is not true data because the participants are not facing the truth.
They all think that objects made or refined what they are.
The green part shows how many believers of truth there are. That is exactly what the Bible predicted it would be.
"Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it."
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o You actually think the light saber is real. What people think is not an accurate representation of what is real.
Knowing the truth takes a lot more work than that, you have to face and address the issues. Objects did not make or refine what you are.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o Evolution does not exist. Imagination does not substanciate or equate to evolution.
It is much more rational and logical to say that we have a Maker than to say that objects made or refined us.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o Imagination is not real and evolution is not real.
I learn, there is no such thing as evolution..
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@o1ooo1o That is such a lame argument, I have the same DNA that I started out with the exception of a number corruptions.
JungleJargon 6 hours ago
@JungleJargon Your particular viewpoint however, is not compatible with the 21st century. The evidence clearly shows, your viewpoint is struggling to survive, in an environment, that is no longer conducive to it.
If you can not evolve accordingly, then as per the law of Natural Selection, you are destined for extinction.
You are already an endangered species, and your only option is to EVOLVE. . .
. . .or perish.
o1ooo1o 1 day ago