Obama. Hope and change doesnt work in Iraq

Obama against the surge

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Iraq

[mylegsareswollen]

The reason Bush will be smelling like a rose in the eyes of history.

Defying his commanders and public opinion, he doubled down and made it happen.

The of which history is made.

Obama is a classic liberal appeaser who runs when the going gets tough.

[Craggies63]

The audacity of the Dope!

[reschywangy18]

obama, can only use the big ten words, and once the vocab runs out, he simply can not put his words into action! he is a flat out liar and a shmooser! lateeeeee

[benbehling]

FUCK OBAMA! that fucking retard!

[maxine2win]

This election is too important to get wrong

Obama might not be ideal but he is much better than McCain

[ihdieselman]

If you think surrender is a good option then move to france.

[Ishkielov]

Had we surrendered and stopped being so stubborn in the Vietnam, we would have ended up with a lot less messed up and dead men. And Iraq is our generation's Vietnam. And guess who ended up winning Vietnam? You know, my friend's father was a Vietnam vet, and every time a helicopter flies over, he ducks down in the fetal position on the floor. Now, what I am saying is we are fighting a pointless war (Just as was Vietnam). All I am saying is quitting while you are ahead is not the same as quitting.

[KNrockin]

what do obama and homeless people have in common?

they both believe in the power of change!

what's the only thing that is smaller than obama's list of accomplishments?

his IQ level!

why have wisdom and good judgement when you can have hope and change!

an obama nation = an ABOMINATION!

NObama bi(n la)den 08!

[ihdieselman]

So what you are saying is that surrender is what we should have done? What do you suppose would have happened if we tried that during the revolutionary war? Or maybe the war of 1812 or WWI or WWII or the cold war? Yea surrender is a great way to solve the problem isn't it? If we had surrendered in any of these wars do you think you would be here to comment on this video today?

[Ishkielov]

But, in truth, our involvement there really has little to do with them ending their civil war. In truth, it more than likely would have ended just as quickly without us. All we have really done is maybe saved a few peoples' lives who were caught in the crossfire. Now, I am not saying that is a bad thing, but what cost do we pay for it? The ravages it has had upon our economy and unity are almost irreparable in the short term, and it will take many years before we return to our previous status.

[Ishkielov]

You all act as if Obama changes because of polls. Obama changes because of changes in the world around him. Because we are starting to have good effects in Iraq, he is supporting the surge. In truth had we pulled out then, our country would not be in such an economic depression as we are now, but at this point it is actually more beneficial to our economy to stay. Why? Because should we create stability, which is actually in sight now, pulling out will be cheaper and a lot more cut and dry.