HUD Assault on Westchester Neighborhoods

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,228
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 17, 2009

After County Executive Andrew Spano lured many Westchester neighborhoods into accepting federal funds for various purposes, HUD and the radical NYC "Anti-Discrimination Committee" want to create a national precedent for the forcible integration of neighborhoods via "affordable housing."

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is typical of the anti-white diversity craze sweeping America. Any safe, prosperous predominantly White neighborhood is now deemed to be "a problem" that needs "fixing". Fixing this area means flooding it with negroes and mestizos, most of whom are unemployed, on welfare, or have minimal incomes. Dumping these black/brown undesirables on whatever is left of White America will devolve that area into a slum. They won't be happy until all of USA is a poverty-ridden third world slum.

  • The statement regarding the required income level is highly misleading; 50% of median is a maximum household income for renters, while 80% of the median is a maximum for homebuyers. No minimum income would apply, Recently proposed legislation would forbid any discrimination on the basis of of source of income. The units could be filled with Section 8 tenants.

  • What is Spano's real motivation? Is he trying to unload failed Westchester RE investments on the county? OR does he and his gang want to force White flight so that they can sell Ulster & Putnam properties at a steep mark-up to "refugees"? I wonder if they could be prosecuted under RICO.

  • I hope the residents of Westchester are preparing for the coming crime spree and plummeting property values. The smart ones are selling now before its too late.

  • Suburbanites actually have less privacy than city dwellers in some respects. One Westchester home is set back very far from the sidewalk, and its front picture windows have a view of their neighbors' outdoor patio. If Section 8'ers were to move into the house with the patio and decide to throw loud parties until late every night, the owners of this home would lose all enjoyment of their property. Not fair. Spano doesn't understand: Stability, not upset, must be the goal of government.

  • Yeah, I noted McLaughlin's use of the word "silliness" to describe the natural reaction of people who wish to protect their families and their homes from hostilities such as occurred in Anaheim & Antioch CA where the Section 8'ers organized and filed a class action suit vs the local police merely for responding to calls from neighbors concerned about drug trade & violent threats.

  • I think Jim Russell presents a valid point of view.

    I don't see other communities, wealthy jewish communites for example, building affordable housing marketed in particular to the European-American community or Asian community.

    I see this as Government interference with neighborhood choices. Why these social engineering experiments are always hoisted onto the majority population or Europena-Americans is beyond me, despite the silliness of Randolph McLaughlin and Andrew Spano.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more