9/11 Un-debunked Version 2.0: WTC 7's Collapse Is Still A Mystery

A new version of my "9/11 Un-debunked" series. Share and enjoy!

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/05/physics-of-wtc-7.html
http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/NIST_Analyses_Brookman.pdf
http://911blogger.com/node/17794
http://www.911review.com/articles/ryan/NIST_WTC7.html
http://www.cool-places.0catch.com/911/GreeningCommentsNCSTAR1-9.pdf

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 911
• Truth
• Movement
• New
• World
• Order
• Steven
• E.
• Jones
• Richard
• Gage
• Kevin
• Ryan
• James
• Jim
• Hoffman
• David
• Ray
• Griffin
• Trade
• Center
• WTC
• Twin
• Towers
• Thermite
• Thermate
• Pentagon
• Flight
• 93

[TarisioConductor]

so if there wasn't significant damage to the building, then what is that enormous hole on the south side that's visible at 2:41 ? Somehow it looks like... 25% of the building (south to north, not east to west) has been scooped out! And it happens to be in the same area as the main truss that failed first, causing the penthouse to collapse about 8 seconds before the other trusses gave way under the larger load. Keep on "un-debunking"!

[citizenfor911truth1]

@TarisioConductor

If you actually payed attention to what I said, I claimed that the damage was less severe than thought. That gash is NOT by the main support that failed first. A truss failing did not even cause the collapse. It was supposedly the failure of column 79. Did you even read the report? Regardless of any damage, NIST says it played no role in initiating the collapse. I address this strange gash in this video: watch?v=GlCyDlFE5nU

[kangtimelord]

You claim NIST liars, slander them as being "in on it", yet you cite them to support your foolhardy claims. You are truly a disturbed idiotic fool. Nice going, Twoofer.

[citizenfor911truth1]

@kangtimelord

I do think NIST are liars, but I don't think they're really "in on it," as you say. I've never believed any of NIST's pathetic excuses for why building 7 came down, especially their latest theory: watch?v=7wI1BNgXskM

If you think NIST is wrong, go complain to them, not me. Try something rational before commenting on one of my vidoes next time.

[kangtimelord]

@Twoofer citizenfor911lies1,

If I think NIST is wrong? Are you high? NIST is correct on their analysis. You, who probable barely passed 6th grade, are challenge them? That's like local junior high school girl's softball team taking on NY Yankees in baseball.

Why would NIST lie if they weren't in on it? Your logic, much like entire Twoofer Movement, is a big joke.

[citizenfor911truth1]

@kangtimelord

"That's like local junior high school girl's softball team taking on NY Yankees in baseball."

Really? Because NIST needed a high school teacher to point something out to them that they didn't figure out. watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA

And they certainly don't address any of these problems: watch?v=7wI1BNgXskM

[Galv140577]

@kangtimelord Nist report is full of bullshit, ANYONE who has even a basic understanding of physics can see that

[asicit2b]

1,934

[Galv140577]

@kangtimelord On what do you base your conclusion that the NIST report is "solid"?

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard Galv14057,

"I suppose if it is written on paper then physically it is made of solid matter"

OMFG, you Twooftards have the most braindead responses. Alas, this is not surprising considering you all are bunch of stupid idiotic slandershits.

BTW, answer the fucking question, what is this basic understanding of physics you claim to have, slandershit? I'm guessing it's from "Cracked" magazine.

Fucking moron.

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard Shitfuck TheCurleyG,

"you're a pussy"

Good one, slandershit. You've proven you have the intellectual capacity of a retard two year dog. Congrats, prick.

I'm not afraid of the reality of 9-11, nor am I afraid of a dumbass paranoid shittard like you, freak.

[Galv140577]

@kangtimelord So to summerise your point here is that the NIST report is... "solid"

...whatever that means. I suppose if it is written on paper then physically it is made of solid matter, so yes I agree with you on that point. Well done!

XDXDXDXDXDXD!!!!!!!!!

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard Galv140577,

Your "basic understanding of physics" is pathetic, slandershit. What is this understanding based on, Mad Magazine? I have a Bachelor's of Science in Engineering Physics and NIST report is solid. You claim it is full of bullshit? XDXDXDXDXDXD!!!!!!!!!

Fucking retard.

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard citizenfor911twoofIQ1,

Yeah, David "Slandershit" Chandler is a pathetic worm. Claiming he was responsible for "pointing something out" is a fucking lie. You Twooftard morons are pathetic.

[kangtimelord]

@Twooftard TheCurleyGoon,

WTF is your problem, shithead? You slander NIST based on your bonehead Twooftard shit "science", and I'm the fucking idiot? XDXDXDXDXDXDXD!

[carnage4907]

@TarisioConductor Damage to one corner cannot cause simultaneous global collapse. Go back to 7th grade physics