Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Countdown: Worst Person Feb. 13, 2008

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,863
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 13, 2008

And the winner is..... Antonin Scalia. Runners up Tom Davis and John McCain.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Olberman vs. Scalia is like a five year old vs. Stephen Hawking. Olberman, you're way . . . way . . . way . . . out of your league on this one. You aren't even worthy to lick the dust off Scalia's feet. Get a life. Nobody likes you, but Janeane Garofolo.

  • This is a blatant misunderstanding of Scalia's position...

    Torture is not punishment, therefore it does not fall under the "cruel and unusual PUNISHMENT" clause, so it is not unconstitutional. That is Scalia's position as I understand it and it is obviously true.

    He has also said he is against torture and thinks it is illegal for separate reasons...

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is no way Hawking can be mentioned as a comparison to that fat fuck Scalia. And as for the torture issue, let's put you torture-toters and give you a waterboarding; I bet we can get you to confess to the 911 attacks.

  • this is why msnbc is a fucking joke

  • Olbermann is an idiot.  If you want to hear Scalia's full torture interview see:

    watch?v=zDNkEsB6VzE

  • lolbermann

  • But the whole point is that there are not two classes of people: terrorists and non-terrorists. Taking away the civil liberties of violent muslim fanatics (probably what you mean by terrorists) will affect the civil liberties of future dissidents. HR1955 allows the government to broadly define the definition of terrorism. Combine that with a legal system where terrorists receive no due process, and it becomes easy to see potential abuses against citizens.

  • I see your point, but I disagree that terrorists deserve the rights given in the constitution. Also, to say that by stripping away the rights of terrorists our rights might one day be stripped as well is a "slippery slope" argument that I don't subscribe to.

  • Of course, when you phrase it in such simplistic, weighted terms its easy to deride. If you phrase it in terms of "upholding civil liberties" or "protecting the Constitution" or "maintaining our moral superiority" it doesn't sound so bad. If we consider that terrorists are still humans, and that the rights we give terrorists affect the rights all of us receive, it doesn't have to be so cut and dry.

  • More rights for terrorists! Olbermann is my hero!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more