SGI Octane Tour & Disassembly - Part One

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,144
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 3, 2010

Walkaround and discussing of the SGI Octane, with a complete disassembly thrown in.

Lot of rambling involved, I needed three videos to cover it!

Part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTZRE5zAhLc
Part three: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-HlOdbutD0

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jpkiwigeek)

  • mine is complete with irix and a 13wto vga adapter i don't have the right keyboard

  • Any PS/2 keyboard will work with an Octane. SGI hasn't used proprietary keyboards since the original Onyx. Even then you can actually buy/build adaptors using microcontrollers to do the conversion, as it happens.

  • Btw, I completely forgot: on the fromtplane (at least that is how I used to call the backplane in the Octane) that connector which looks like a serial port is the service port.

  • What's the service port used for? Board testing?

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @psyjax2 When the Octane was new, it was way faster than the PCs of the time. I recall doing comparative speed tests at the time. Then the DEC Alpha came out and blew both the PC and Octane away. Intel and Compaq purchased the Alpha technology, and out of 'nowhere' appears the Pentium II. And that's when the PC overtook the SGI Octane and the DEC Alpha.

  • thanks for sharing. never even seen one of these.

  • You dont need 14 of them.. .send me one :)

  • @Mydadsdog SGI with MIPS technology made hardware that was perfectly targeted for CGI computing. They excelled a that even if the RAM & CPU Freq was lower than PC hardware. They were many folds faster in real world processing. But the set of targeted task became so wide as technology adavanced, SGI could not keep up.

  • The design is reminiscent of the NeXTdimension of the early '90s; albeit much, much more powerful. :)

  • On release SGI systems could be bought for £22000+ back then they were light years ahead of PC systems for CG. Do these systems still offer reasonable performance in comparison to a decent PC workstation today equipped with Firepro or Quadro cards? Any information or comparisons would be greatly appreciated.

  • Funny to think how all this hardware was needed to basically match what a ~5 year old PC could do.

  • Beautiful ^-^

  • @jpkiwigeek  "Usually my wife stays out of the basement, which helps, but she also has her vices (we have one bedroom completely filled with scrapbooking and stamping supplies), which pretty much seals the deal. Plus... she's pretty cool ;)"

    You both sound cool, it's a pity you live that far away, otherwise I would hop by one day.

  • @ramquez31 Huzzah! Congratulations :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more