Nassim Haramein 15/45

Physicist Nassim Haramein talks about unlocking the truth to Sacred geometry, fractals, the Mayan calendar and 2012, Crop Circles, cabalistic traditions, chakras, Sun Gods, God. Jesus and Freemasonry (more specifically, the Knights of Templar).

Nassim Haramein's exciting work, prepare yourself for an exhilarating odyssey into hyperspace and beyond. Haramein, who has spent his lifetime researching fields of physics from quantum theory to relativistic equations and cosmology, will lead you along a fascinating discussion geared to a layman's understanding of the fundamental nature of the universe and creation that includes black holes, gravitational forces, dimensions, and the very structure of space itself - all of which are integral parts of his now-complete Unified Field Theory. Haramein's theory is currently in peer review process for publication in physics journals; however, the presentation does not end with the introduction of his theory alone, but includes the discussion of the path that he took to arrive at his views, which weaves between the texts and monuments of ancient civilizations, biology, chemistry and the primordial role of consciousness - all of which lend further credence to the science behind the theory.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Black
• holes
• energy
• Universal
• Law
• Fractal
• UFO
• Sighting
• Alien
• Crop
• Circles
• Pyramids
• Unified
• Field
• Theory
• Nassim
• Haramein
• Dimension
• Physics
• Event
• Horizon
• of
• everything
• Sacred
• Geometry
• Relativity
• Albert
• Einstien
• Nicola
• Tesla
• Perfect
• Circle
• sound
• Life
• Planetary
• systems
• gravity

[obeliskbreaker]

A theory in science is different than a theory in conversation or the general perception of what the word means. In science, a theory is not just a hypothesis or a guess, it is a collection of many observations that all point to a common conclusion. If any real proof comes along that goes against any one theory and the theory cannot be altered to account for it the theory should be abandoned, sadly we often see that this is not the case. Theories are usually as close as we can ever get to law

[liztoob]

@SubliminalAttraction - You're correct!!! We SHOULD be less judgemental. Our breakdown in values however, has created a subculture of rip-off artists. This causes us to trust less often, those that are truly attempting to share, or teach us something of value.

Agree w/Nassim or not, just taking the time to listen to someone speak about sacred geometry is (at least) a step in a good direction. If one disagrees, move on. Why remain at the obstacle while complaining about it?

[TheBobathon]

@steezster I can see the attraction of reading all sorts of things into views you disagree with. But funnily enough, the reason I'm saying he's wrong is because he's wrong.

[steezster]

@TheBobathon So everything he has is wrong? Of course everyone is going to tell him he's wrong, and tell him his research is bunk. That's a given. No one accepts anything until they are absolutely forced to, I suppose you would say as well that the US is fine and dandy, we're only in Libya to help the people there, we only went to Iraq to topple a dictator, 9-11 wasn't set up by the government, and that our economy will never fail. Ignorance is bliss my friend, you must be one happy fellow

[TheBobathon]

@steezster As you rightly say, you can't be expected to accept this unless you don't question it at all.

He says what he has always said since then (2003) - that his work is just getting peer reviewed. He's failed consistently for over a decade because his work is garbage. Eventually he forced his way into pseudo-peer-review by abusing the system: search for harameinAIP for more.

Yes, having an open mind is great...unless of course you use it to ignore the masses of evidence for him being a fake

[steezster]

@buerm009 actually, they do oscillate. a frequency of 10^11 Hz is so fast that one can make the false assumption that it doesnt move. in fact, an object moving that fast would essentially be frozen in time in our field of vision, or we would appear stopped in theirs. please dont try to discredit his points with subpar arguements such as your own. you clearly state that you are no expert, how about you let the experts talk?

[steezster]

@steeltable218 he wasnt saying he has been peer reviewed, he said it was in process. dont try to discredit him before watching it with an open mind. you cant expect to accept any of this if you go in ready to argue every point

[3877michael]

Blah Blah ! Right or wrong. True or false. This is entertainment. What ever you are looking for you will find. And if you are good at math you can back it up. All science is pointless to understand truth or reality. Not gonna happen. Truth and understanding are experiences. YES? The finite mind can never be used to perceive or understand the totality of creation. Look another way, without using the mind.

I could be wrong !

[buerm009]

His ideas are fun and interesting to think about. However, when he started talking about lipoprotein oscillation I started to question his ideas. I am fairly certain that lipoproteins, themselves, do not oscillate. I am no expert by any means but look into it for yourselves. Most of his facts are half-truths. Such as black holes existing within black holes. That kind of defeats the whole idea of a black hole as a singular mass, but I suppose that is his arguement. Anyway, I'll keep watching.

[gorddown1111]

its starting to happen

[steeltable218]

@mrhoan I don't claim credibility. I just checked into his claims and 'facts' for myself. Try doing the same and then honestly ask yourself if Haramein is 'credible'.