God, Darwin, and Design 5 - Ken Miller

Part 5 from Ken Miller's "God, Darwin, and Design- Lessons from the Dover Monkey Trial" lecture at U of Texas- Austin.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ken
• miller
• evolution
• creationism
• dover
• trial
• intelligent
• design

[ThatOneQuestion]

@LoricaLady silly little child, you still dont understand why no one will accept your lies and bullshit?

Everyone understands your points because you are doing nothing but vomiting your ignorance all over channels with Ken Miller videos because you are obsessed with him. Everyone can see you for the propagandist that you are.

Shut your face, LoricaLady. For many months you have been continually ignoring the refutations posted against you. Do the world a favor and shut up.

[foxlake02]

@LoricaLady "Shouldn't they show a fusion of ape chromosomes?" We are apes and it does. The fact is, our genome is 98% identical to chimpanzee's. 96% if you include insertions and deletions. This is less than the difference between horses and zebras. The morphology is almost entirely a matter of proportions. Why is it you have no problem with the speciation of bacteria, fruit flies, bats or other large groups but insist that the apes are somehow different?

[MattleSystem]

@LoricaLady And the MAIN LOGICAL FALLACY you do is pretending that if Evolution is wrong, you are necessary right!!!

And all of this with full of science debate product of "GOD DID IT"!!!

[LoricaLady]

Cont. These are Correlation Does Not Imply Causation & Incomplete Comparison. However, evoutionary defense sites, & evo lit in general, show many other logical fallacies as well. Continuing on at Vid 6.

[MattleSystem]

@LoricaLady Copy and paste, maybe the only thing that you really well do here!

Genes similarity, instead of reading "answeringeneis" you should have a look to "talkorigins"...It is far most usefull.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. Shubin is making the claim that Darwin's predictions have been verified. Same ol' bait & switch. Talk about one simlarity, placement of certain genes, and ignore (like you are to ignore that his replica of Tiktaalik has long, muscular, frontal fins for "emerging" onto land when the actual fossil shows very short fins with no musculature) the fact that the content of the genes is human only, not that of an ape. Again, evolution is based most on these 2 logical fallacies... Cont.

[LoricaLady]

5:15 "We've got the genes too." What kind of science is this? Well, pseudo science as usual. Human beings and primates do NOT have the same genes. They have some simlarities, as one would expect.. But the genes are not identiical, any more than we are identical to them. At 5:40 Neil Shubin again, the same one who presented the phony replica of Tiktaalik alongside the actual fossil, trusting, correctly, that folk would not see the bait & switch. Cont.

[LoricaLady]

TO ANY INTERESTED: If you note I do not reply to the posters below, those Miller guard dogs & others know they are on ignore for: following me for months from vid to vid with personal insults, name calling, hiding my posts gross obscenities,, false accusations of lying, and in the case of foxlake, sexual harrassment & telling a poster who sent me a 0 science porno post "Good job." Such behaviors inhibit the true purposes of science. I will debate with those who are civil and objective.

[MattleSystem]

@MattleSystem What HT is telling you is that no matter what you have for the result in phenotype, the genotype is pratically similar to the human! And if we look just at the structure, then DNA is the same for all on earth!

DNA is just a serie of element randomly transmit from of generation to another! The change with the time gives different phenotype etc. etc. At one stage, the difference in the genotype is large enough to be considered as a new specie!

This is evolution...DNA evidence!