A Case For Intelligent Design? (1)
Top Comments
All Comments (707)
-
I don't agree with the caller at all, but it's nice to see someone on the Atheist Experience finally has some intelligence to argue.
-
Another thing to consider is that parts can be removed as well as added. So the evolutionary pathway for an irreducibly complex system wouldn't just contain the addition of parts and changes in function, but also the removal of parts.
Consider the construction of a stone archway that's held together by its own weight. It can't be done by just adding stones one at a time, but if you add a support structure, then take it away once the arch is built, you now have an irreducibly complex structure.
-
At some point, this intelligent designer decided that we should eat, breathe, and talk all through the same hole, and that our social structure should require that we do all three at the same time.
-
I wouldn't call intelligent design having my most sensitive area (My testicles) exactly at the middle of my legs wide open to any kind of attack, where any girl could easily kick them and inflict pain. XD
-
@samaroo96 Recognize by looking at present situations on this world. Earthquake, tsunami, tornado, flood, sickness, crime and recess??? Tornado's where in this country before christianity was, 81% of earthquakes happen in the ring for fire, floods/tsunamis have been going on for billions of years. You make no sense at all. All the things you mention are part of what makes the world the dynamic ever changing planet it is and will do so long after the CANCER that is christianity is dead
-
Friends now it's time to decide. Jesus Christ declared 2000 years ago that I AM THE WAY, I AM THE TRUTH AND I AM THE LIFE. These claim were made by only one Man, He is Jesus Christ. Now you have to decide in your heart, whether Jesus was liar or He really is THE WAY, TRUTH and LIFE. Only by Faith, you can accept Him as your Savior. Judgement of God for all sinners in on the way. Recognize by looking present situation on this world. Earthquake, tsunami, tornado, flood, sickness, crime and recess
intelligent design? anyone who believes in that has never tried to take a piss whilst they have a boner, there is nothing intelligent about that design (><)
walruscrowface 4 months ago 27
Michael Behe's definiton is purposely vague and unreasonable. "Take one part out and the system will not fulfill its purpose." First of all, part is not a scientific term. Second, body parts are not like Jenga Towers. Randomly taking out molecules, tissues, etc and expecting the structure to function is just stupid. Creationist result to nitpicking and wordplay to make their points.
MunkyDrag0n 2 months ago 3