The $1.5 Billion Alternative to Milwaukie's Light Rail
Loading...
1,185
Loading...
Uploader Comments (cascadepolicy)
see all
All Comments (4)
-
The bulk of the money goes to an exclusive right-of-way which enhances the quality of service to an extent that you have not included.
At (MdJ4F) you can see a chart comparing (Rail vs Bus) VS (How it gets there).
I like the idea of an electrically powered bus (preferable in ground inductive instead of overhead wires) with a tiny battery for 1-2 mile of off line range.
Either way the cost of purchase or rehab of an exclusive ROW is expensive be needed for high speed public transit.
-
the problem is traffic. those buses add to congestion and greenhoise gas emissions. not a fast ride for commuters and sucks for the earth.
Loading...
Curious. What about the gas to fuel all those buses, every day, 24/7? Was that figured into this 'equation?' The main point of light rail is its energy efficiency. I'm sure there are less snarky ways of looking at and controlling a budget and being proactive for the environment. This really isn't it.
Dijeratic 5 months ago in playlist More videos from cascadepolicy
@Dijeratic Yeah, we factored in fuel costs and a number of other costs as well. You can view all our assumptions by clicking the link in the videos comments.
This video was meant to put some perspective on $1.5b. Feel free to post your ideas for how to spend the money!
cascadepolicy 5 months ago