Who will face up to the climate change crisis?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,273
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 24, 2008

http://therealnews.com/c.php?c=08081YT
Obama and McCain both say global warming a problem, but are their proposals enough to make a difference?

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • What's most amusing about greenhouse denial trolls?

    They're like the libertarian frat boys I met in college who were carrying a torch for tobacco companies. ("You can't prove smoking causes cancer! Liberals are just attacking tobacco companies because they have a successful product!") These guys didn't smoke; they didn't own tobacco stock; they were just being contrarian lackeys.

    Maybe they thought siding with big business would earn them a place at Ayn Rand's side.

  • You are 21 years old and have no resources except apparently blogs when I just happened to be there. Google the petition project. An explanation for global warming that last time I checked was signed by 30 thousand plus scientist.

see all

All Comments (174)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • With the collapse of the IPCC and the global warming alarmists in general, one can only look back at this rubbish and laugh.... such an embarrassment.

  • Cambrian was all sealife and at the end there was extinctions because of rapid rise in temperatures..from C02, also that was more than 500 million years ago, doofus. NO land life could survive in that condition. So you are saying you want the earth to revert to just primitive sealife like in Cambrian that would spend hundreds million years to balance out all that poisonous human C02-you want to commit mass murder and destroy all life on land to satisfy your greed. Typical.

  • yes it is too much CO2 is a poison that acts as greenhouse gas and destroys planets. Earlier warmings took at least a 100 million years, not 200 years. One exception was a 10 million year warming that caused mass extinction-even that period was too fast for earth to cope. Obviously humans are less intelligent than plankton..at least plankton contribute to the environment not rape it. Humans are a mutated virus and always wrong. Not to be rude but you're a sad example of a rotted human brain :D

  • I think you should review your comments and realize that you are being fairly rude.

    As I have said. CO2 isn't a poison. We breath it out, plants breath it in. This is a natural cycle. The more CO2 in the air, the better and stronger that plants grow.

    The Cambrian period saw the evolution of the eye, and CO2 levels were much higher than today (today: 390ppm, Cambrian: 7,000ppm) and temperature was just as it is today.

  • Giga is the prefix for the billion multiplier. There is a difference between CO2 and Mercury/Arsenic. Firstly we breath out CO2, plants breath it in and it is a natural part of life with or without humans.

  • its 16 BILLION tons of EXTRA c02 not carbon and its not "gtones" dumbshit and btw i'm going to dump 16 billion tons of arsenic and mercury into your living room a year. don't complain my orders are you will die with a smile on your face since your living room is not your property anyway so you should smile while you turn green from poison. Oh and its my 100% right to pollute and dump any crap I please in your house so take your whiney complaints elsewhere.

  • Erm... no it doesn't. Human output of CO2 is 24gtones/year. The annual CO2 in the atmosphere is only increasing by 15gtones/year. Clearly 9gtones of human output is being absorbed.

    Why is it that CO2 is pumped into greenhouses and other plant growing facilities? Because the more CO2, the better and faster the plants grow. Plants absorb the energy earth receives to split CO2, releasing oxygen, and storing Carbon, which animals eat, and breath in the O to gain energy.

  • Even a kindergartner can understand if you put 16 billion tons of extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere a year that won't be absorbed by oceans and plants you will have a problem, cuz that extra C02 stays in the atmosphere 100 years. And the chemistry and physics of carbon dioxide is greenhouse-it absorbs sun's radiation. Extra carbon dioxide is like a poison upsetting the earth. And the plants don't absorb that extra. There isn't extra plants doofus, in fact humans are cutting down everything.

  • Utter Shit

    1. Carbon Dioxide is a PRODUCT of temperature change, not a cause.

    2. The warmer it gets, the more polar bears there are.

    3. The temperature on earth is primarily dictated by the sun. We are currently entering a cooling period.

    4. C02, the main concern in this debate, is a primary fuel for life. The more C02, the more plants that can grow and thrive.

    5. The attempts to change public perception by using chemtrails to dissipate air moisture causing cities to warm up won't help you.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more