California Earthquake Prediction for September 18, 2009

FACING THE FUTURE http://dcsymbols.com/future/future.htm

The 5.8 quake Dec 30th happened in the same place, and was the largest of 2009.

Please see also my Feb 14, 2009 video "April 6: Moon Saturn Conjunctions and Earthquakes". April 6th was the day the the quake happened in Italy at a moon/Saturn conjunction. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrmH2RrziQ


"What if nothing happens today?"
"It will show that astrology cannot predict earthquakes"

What if I am able to predict the time of the largest quake in California in 2009 so far to within hours 10 months ahead of time?

Bigbytes


List of southern California quakes:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/shakemap/list.php?y=2009&n=sc

List of northern California quakes:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/shakemap/list.php?y=2009&n=nc

The Calexico quake Sept 19th was the largest quake in California this year. The next largest was a 4.9r W of Petrolia, CA on August 7th. There was a 4.9r quake in the Gulf of California Sept 13.

California quake history:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/historical_state.php

The last 6+ quake in California was 2005.

As we move into 2009, Saturn and Uranus move closer and closer to being directly opposite one another (as seen from the sun) while Neptune moves closer and closer to conjoining (ASFTS) Neptune.
The day that Sat. and Uran. oppose, Jup. and Nept. are just 3 seconds apart.

It just so happens that the earth crosses the line between the sun and Uranus on that day, and its a new moon, and Mercury passes between the earth and the sun.

On that day we see Uranus, the earth, the moon, Mercury, the sun and Saturn in a line, plus Neptune and Jupiter are conjoining. This is on top of the fact that the moon is in a point in its eclipse cycle conducive to California quakes.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 2009

[ISHITY0SMITY]

My B-day. All of 22. No big Qwake that day.

[Marztech5]

I predict it'll be in your state.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

The point of the video was that I was predicting an uptick in California quakes at that new moon. The Calexico quake Sept 19th was the largest quake in California up to that point that year. It initiated the last cluster of large Cali-quakes. I have sent you the link to my vid about the next cluster and when that will begin - 2015.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"so check and see if that was the case. My feeling is there weren't any."

Once again, research is NOT your strong point I see:

05 28 - Offshore Honduras - M 7.3 Fatalities 7

07 15 - Off West Coast of the South Island, New Zealand - M 7.8

07 09 - Yunnan, China - M 5.7 Fatalities 1

12 19 - Taiwan - M 6.4

Earth passed between the sun and Jupiter & Neptune from Aug 13-18

08 17 - Southwestern Ryukyu Islands, Japan - M 6.7

08 16 - Kepulauan Mentawai region, Indonesia - M 6.7

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"Leo the Lion, are also trillions of miles apart from each other, hence have no relationship to each other"

Kent. It is just a naming convention used for determining celestial longitudes. If I say A conjoins B in X degrees of Y constellation, I am NOT saying that A and B are related to Y but to each other by being at the same celestial longitude. You are trying to make issues that don't exist. You argument relates to nothing.

[kentaappel]

But if there is anything planetary conjuction connections, then in 2009 Jupiter and Neptune were at their closest line ups on May 27, July 9, and December 21 of that year so check and see if that was the case. My feeling is there weren't any.

[kentaappel]

Besides, the sun, the moon, and the planets are never in a particular constellation as they are merely in the same line of sight with stars that are trillions of miles in the distance that are not even related to each other as the stars of say, for example, Leo the Lion, are also trillions of miles apart from each other, hence have no relationship to each other. So if we could get to the closest star of Leo we would not be in Leo but at that star with the others very far off in the distance.

[kentaappel]

@followingtheplanets Yes, it is important that the positions in the sky that astrologers referrece are wrong because, as in the case of the Sept. 19, 2009 positions in the sky of Neptune and Jupiter we can look up at the sky and see that those planets were in Aquarius and not, as the astrologers say, in Pisces. The same thing with the so called new moon in Pisces, the moon is actually also in Aqaurius and not Pisces.

[followingtheplanets]

@kentaappel

"I believe that the main point of the video was to high light the sun, Saturn and Uranus.

If you read my stuff about California quakes you will see that I say that California quakes happen near Jupiter/Neptune conjunctions. Quite the debunker aren't you Kent.

"Astrologers don't even have the positions in the sky correct."

That's like saying the USGS doesn't have the time of quakes correct since it uses UTC and not local time. You are a real dull one.

followingtheplanets

[kentaappel]

@dcsymbols Jupiter was not in conjuction with Neptune on Sept 19, 2009 as it they were six degrees apart in the night sky, not a close line up really. I looked it up in my astronomy planetarium program called "Orion The Sky"

Also, if you using astrology, you probably think that Jupiter and Neptune were in Pisces when in fact it was, in the actual sky, in Aquarius. Astrologers don't even have the positions in the sky correct.