9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used? - Hollywood Response

September 11th Revisited v.2 is a follow up to perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archive news footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on television. Featuring interviews with eyewitnesses & firefighters, along with expert analysis by BYU Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, MIT Engineer Jeffrey King, and Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.

Visit http://www.911revisited.com to get the DVD of this movie. You can also download or watch the entire film online for free. You are encouraged to copy this film and distribute it for non-profit educational purposes.

Website: http://www.911revisited.com




KEYWORDS: September 11th Revisited 9/11 george bush dick cheney donald rumsfeld condoleezza rice 9-11 WTC pentagon thermite thermate bombs explosions building 7 WTC7 silverstein NORAD 911 wtc7 truth movement 911 facts info 9-11 september 11th 2001 wtc wtc1 wtc2 wtc7 collapse bombs explosions bombs secondary explosions explosive devices 9/11 witnesses questions fire mysteries painful deceptions north tower south tower coverup cover-up cover up police officers media reporters towers basements buildings collapsed controlled demolition implosion world experts squibs eyewitness collapse freefall speed Building 7 plane steel Jet-fuel temperature shaped-charges diagonal sulfur residue molten government mainstream media Google yahoo ron paul 2008 9-11 alex jones larry silverstein pull it loose change 2nd edition lc2e dylan avery wtc wtc1 wtc2 wtc7 collapse bombs explosions george bush usa vice president america pearl harbor titanic sinking ship free hugs campaign new world order nwo terrorstorm teacher archival footage archived history police chase paris hilton jail a few good men flight 93 11 77 175 jfk conspiracy screw fire burn july of kissing kiss hot cold iraq war ww2 wwii world war 7 Days in September 9/11: A Closer Look 9/11: Attack or Godsend 911 Eyewitness 911 File Unsolved 911 File Unsolved The Great Illusion The Greatest Lie Ever Sold Historical Background In Plane Site The Director's Cut Mysteries Press for Truth The Road to Tyranny Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 911 Louder Than Words Building the World Trade Center Bush's Response to 9/11 Confronting the Evidence Conspiracy Theories Destruction of Building 7 Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime Face the Facts Great Deception Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire Improbable Collapse Justice for 9-11! Loose Change 2nd Edition Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State Mohamed Atta & The Venice Flying Circus Painful Deceptions Pandora's Black Box - Flight Of American 77 PentaCon Perspective on 9-11 Video Collection Secret Evil of 9/11 The Secret History of 9/11 September 11 Revisited September 11 Revisited v.2 Summary of 9-11 Take Back 911 Truth and Lies of 9-11 What's The Truth?: How Indeed Did The Twin Towers Collapse? Who Killed John O'Neill? WTC - The First 24 Hours

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• 9-11
• september
• 11
• steven
• jones
• david
• ray
• griffin
• jeff
• king
• revisited
• 911revisited
• tribute
• wtc
• wtc7
• conspiracy

[dreadnaught2]

I always think of crack heads like Sheen when I need demolition and structural engineering expertise. Sheen never even finished high school. Truthers have their heros. LOL

[Alaskaslim]

@pettyofficer30

"At the pentagon No wings,"

There were wing pieces and wing marks.

Further, whatever hit he Pentagon, needed a wingspan of over 100 feet, because it also ran into the Generator, it just doesn't fit otherwise.

It also needed to be heavy, that generator was over 20 tons, and the object pushed it aside.

[LxE100]

@pettyofficer30 Yup. Clearly an inside job.

[pettyofficer30]

@LxE100 At the pentagon No wings, fuselage luggage! What looked liked landing gear was wire spoolage casing.

[14knuckledragger]

kind of explains how Charlie Sheen became a lightning rod later on....

[LxE100]

@Alaskaslim I already watched the video. How do they know "pull it" only refers to pulling a building down with wires? All the buildings that Larry Silverstein owned, just happened to be the only buildings that fell down in the entire WTC. Doesn't seem like a coincidence to me.

Alex Jones is an information expert. Watch this video. It has multiple experts calling 9/11 an inside job.

/watch?v=_quRtCGLnzo&list=FLu9­Oi9Z2MU-6rR3Xn3AKzHw&index=1&f­eature=plpp_video

[Alaskaslim]

@LxE100

... Alex Jones? The F*cking guy who thinks the Government is manufacturing Gays?

No, he is not an expert, give me an EXPERT.

Here is the video I posted again, please watch it;

/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8

It quotes the industry. "Pull it" may refer to pulling a building down with wires, as they did with the remains of WTC 6, but clearly, that didn't happen at 7.

[LxE100]

@Alaskaslim Why would Larry Silverstein refer to these people leaving the building by saying "pull it"? It makes no sense.

Anyway, this video proves that it is a demolition term.

/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY

[Alaskaslim]

@LxE100

"Actually, when people say "pull it," it means they're ready to demolish it."

No, it doesn't. THat'ts made up, no one who works in the Demoliino industry, would confirm that.

THis came out of a statement he said, while he was talking TO THE FIRE COMMANDER, and by "Pull", he was referring to "pull out"

It's in his statement, watch the video.

"Many demolition experts agree."

You can't quote one, I can quote 11. There is no disagreement, they say you're wrong.

[LxE100]

@LxE100 Even if he didn't mean to demolish it when he said "pull it," it was still an obvious controlled demolition.