@vipsamsam "But based on evidence we have, he is forced to conclude Jesus indeed Existed."
I see you ignored all the posts I wrote last night specifically for you, asking what this evidence was, and to name a single source that mentions Jesus during the time he was alive.
They say we aren't suppose to question God. Hmmmm.. Ok, homo erectus and other hominds had very small cranial capacity which means they didn't have any intellegence of modern humans have today, so if our brain has well evolved vs. them, why did "it" give us the ability to discover, record, and potentially improvise when issues occur? You guys anchoring the majority from gaining more intellegence, this is why kids believe school sucks, because of you people are slowing time down. Stop barricading
@vipsamsam Btw you really need to read '' Did A Historical Jesus Exist '' by Jim Walker.. an unbiased account of what is known of Jesus, written by an Historian that knows Julius Caesar existed because we have documented eyewitness accounts of his life, written by people at the time he lived.. how the fuck Ehram can call himself an Historian when he doesn't understand the difference between fact and fiction is beyond me
@vipsamsam Go back and watch the video again, see how many times he says '' just look at all the evidence '' and when he's asked '' what evidence '' his answer is '' there isn't any evidence for other people either '', thats not evidence, he's actually agreeing there isn't any evidence but ''suggesting'' that it doesn't matter because we can't prove other people existed either.. people incidentally that we DO have historical evidence for, proving the man is an idiot
@vipsamsam And the only person being dishonest is you, the man you put forward as having historical evidence admits he has none, how the fuck can that in any way strengthen your case ?
@vipsamsam Wtf are you talking about, he was a born again christian, and he's a buffoon, he concludes Jesus must have existed because as i said earlier, he can't accept he's wrong, he offers NO evidence whatsoever, NONE, and his statement about every historian agreeing is mocked, you're an idiot if you cannot grasp the mans an oaf, the man doing the interview is taking the piss, are you seriously telling me you see this as anything but an idiot ?, he admits there is NO historical evidence..
Yes! thats my point, he does not believe in God. But based on evidence we have, he is forced to conclude Jesus indeed Existed. But yet if this atheist/skeptic does not deny the evidence, why do you? So, will you use this same argument of no evidence for Jesus existance again? or will you simply keep being dishonest not only with yourself, but others aswell. Maybe its time for you to come to the light, and open your eyes.
@vipsamsam Have you watched the video '' Atheist Stumped By Overwhelming Evidence For Jesus' Existence '' i'm sure you have, in it Bart Ehram is asked this simple question '' We dont have any ancient records of anyone who wrote about Jesus while he was alive do we ? '' Ehrham replies no.. he also shows himself to be extremely poorly educated about history, suggesting there is no historical evidence for a number of people who we know existed, is he the best you can come up with ? sad
God dont talk like this... sorry but if you want people to believe in God... threatening is not God style.. im a CHristian...
ginald26 4 minutes ago
@vipsamsam "But based on evidence we have, he is forced to conclude Jesus indeed Existed."
I see you ignored all the posts I wrote last night specifically for you, asking what this evidence was, and to name a single source that mentions Jesus during the time he was alive.
I wonder why that could be? /sarcasm
Avicaris 5 minutes ago
They say we aren't suppose to question God. Hmmmm.. Ok, homo erectus and other hominds had very small cranial capacity which means they didn't have any intellegence of modern humans have today, so if our brain has well evolved vs. them, why did "it" give us the ability to discover, record, and potentially improvise when issues occur? You guys anchoring the majority from gaining more intellegence, this is why kids believe school sucks, because of you people are slowing time down. Stop barricading
xlrvlac 1 hour ago
@vipsamsam Btw you really need to read '' Did A Historical Jesus Exist '' by Jim Walker.. an unbiased account of what is known of Jesus, written by an Historian that knows Julius Caesar existed because we have documented eyewitness accounts of his life, written by people at the time he lived.. how the fuck Ehram can call himself an Historian when he doesn't understand the difference between fact and fiction is beyond me
Jonboy176 1 hour ago
@vipsamsam Go back and watch the video again, see how many times he says '' just look at all the evidence '' and when he's asked '' what evidence '' his answer is '' there isn't any evidence for other people either '', thats not evidence, he's actually agreeing there isn't any evidence but ''suggesting'' that it doesn't matter because we can't prove other people existed either.. people incidentally that we DO have historical evidence for, proving the man is an idiot
Jonboy176 2 hours ago
@vipsamsam And the only person being dishonest is you, the man you put forward as having historical evidence admits he has none, how the fuck can that in any way strengthen your case ?
Jonboy176 2 hours ago
@vipsamsam Wtf are you talking about, he was a born again christian, and he's a buffoon, he concludes Jesus must have existed because as i said earlier, he can't accept he's wrong, he offers NO evidence whatsoever, NONE, and his statement about every historian agreeing is mocked, you're an idiot if you cannot grasp the mans an oaf, the man doing the interview is taking the piss, are you seriously telling me you see this as anything but an idiot ?, he admits there is NO historical evidence..
Jonboy176 2 hours ago
@Jonboy176
Yes! thats my point, he does not believe in God. But based on evidence we have, he is forced to conclude Jesus indeed Existed. But yet if this atheist/skeptic does not deny the evidence, why do you? So, will you use this same argument of no evidence for Jesus existance again? or will you simply keep being dishonest not only with yourself, but others aswell. Maybe its time for you to come to the light, and open your eyes.
vipsamsam 2 hours ago
@vipsamsam Have you watched the video '' Atheist Stumped By Overwhelming Evidence For Jesus' Existence '' i'm sure you have, in it Bart Ehram is asked this simple question '' We dont have any ancient records of anyone who wrote about Jesus while he was alive do we ? '' Ehrham replies no.. he also shows himself to be extremely poorly educated about history, suggesting there is no historical evidence for a number of people who we know existed, is he the best you can come up with ? sad
Jonboy176 3 hours ago
@Cenasucks0161:"you need to understand Im not your regular brainwashed christian"
Right, you're just another one of those woo-woo person's, yes?
B&W is Black and White (or Grayscale if you prefer)
So tell me, did you trade information in your dreams with anyone whose ALIVE and then verify that you and her/him had that dream exchange?
I think NOT!
AtheistToothFairy 4 hours ago