Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Fusión nuclear en "El Hormiguero" de Cuatro

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
49,404
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2007

Fusión nuclear. E unha pena que non o explicaran mais

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Fandinho)

  • Perdon por el error: es Fusión nuclear, no fisión, je,je

Top Comments

  • Is that a Salad Bowl vaccum chamber?

  • Las temperaturas tan altas en el sol, no son las que producen la fusion nuclear, es al reves; es la fusion nuclear la que produce las temperaturas tan altas. La fusion nuclear se produce por mera presion; los componentes de las capas medias y superiores del sol "aplastan" a los de las capas internas "obligandoles" a fusionarse, lo cual genera energia en forma de luz (visible, la del dia; infrarroja, los famosos UVA y UVB, y todo el resto del espectro), y calor (el que calienta la estrella).

see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nucelar, se dice nucelar...xD

  • @TheNuclearWatermellon trust me i know what all this is and how it works i do physics and plus thiago olson goes to my local university and i have met him so...

  • these types of reactors are strictly for show and could never operate at useful wattages without destroying the containment and/or causing the density of the plasma to be too high in relation to its chamber's volume.

  • the laser thing is an inertial confinement method, its excellent for research but it sucks at creating net gains nor can it even self sustain. to make it self sustain, given it wouldnt overheat, would take the same wattage equivalent to the entire north american power grid. tokamaks are much better than stellarators and is the kind which the true self sustaining fusion reactor uses. tokamaks are by far the best investment in toroidal magnetic containment for future powerplants.

  • @Pimpmastahanhduece i didnt mean "sustain" like it can power itself, just that it can have fusion for more than 1 billionth of a second like the big laser fusion thingy in California. It's annoying that the government is spending billions of dollars in tokamaks when someone with very low intelligence can whip-up a fusion reactor in his basement.

  • @Xu53r1X hirsch meeks fusor IS a fusion reactor. look up inertial electrostatic confinement. BTW hirsch-meeks fusors have enough energy to produce fusion from deuterium, no need for tritium

  • idk, its not too hard to get hold of tritium if your accredited. you can get a good amount for a good price if you buy those tritium light keychain beacons.

  • only one lab can of yet produced a self sustaining fusion chamber. these all lose energy in the process, if im wrong, theres no reason you cant take a fusor in the middle of a grassy field with no batteries and disconnect electric input cable after a point.

  • @TheNuclearWatermellon no its not a nuclear reactor. It is hirsch-meeks-farnsworth but i doubt they have tritium in there just D2

  • thats a Hirsch-Meeks fusor, very easy to build and can actually sustain a nuclear fusion reaction.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more