Both were basically absent! Ludendorff was a (just) a tactical genius! He was perfect in taking advantage of opportunities suddenly arisen out of the battle (which was exactly the thing for the Eastern front: Tannenberg, Masurian Lakes)., but not in this situation.
And he was totally exhausted with nervous breakdowns all along the planning of the offensive!
General von Manstein (WWII) wrote: A wrong operational plan is almost impossible to correct in the operation itself!
Prince Max von Baden and Ludendorff just prior to the offensive: After the prince had asked about the strategy for the whole operation Ludendorff furiously replied the following: "Das Wort Strategie verbitte ich mir! Wir schlagen ein Loch hinein! Danach sehen wir weiter!" (I vehemently refuse the word strategy! We blow a hole into the line! Then we'll see!")
What was needed to turn the odds in favor of the Germans was a brillant strategist and a well thought out operational plan! .
Historical consensus is that it was not effective despite the biggest territorial gains since 1914. It ought to be concepted for decision, but instead ran out of steam in nomansland!
In fact, the Michael offensive was plagued by Ludendorff not realizing Amiens as THE operational - and decisive (!)- goal from the outset. Foch on the contrary was well aware of the situation and even brought up reinforcements behind the British lines!
04.45 I would'nt like to be a british soldier of the 5th army at that moment, it must be hell on earth!
Andiish08 1 month ago
@xxstefanx interessant. weiter bitte :)
Blindanddumb 3 months ago
part 4
And even if this main factor - Amiens - had been correctly analyzed it would have been far away from a sure thing!
There were some other important factors that would have made the separation of the French and British forces very unlikely!
(but that would really take too long here...!)
xxstefanx 7 months ago
part 3
Both were basically absent! Ludendorff was a (just) a tactical genius! He was perfect in taking advantage of opportunities suddenly arisen out of the battle (which was exactly the thing for the Eastern front: Tannenberg, Masurian Lakes)., but not in this situation.
And he was totally exhausted with nervous breakdowns all along the planning of the offensive!
General von Manstein (WWII) wrote: A wrong operational plan is almost impossible to correct in the operation itself!
.
xxstefanx 7 months ago
part 2:
Prince Max von Baden and Ludendorff just prior to the offensive: After the prince had asked about the strategy for the whole operation Ludendorff furiously replied the following: "Das Wort Strategie verbitte ich mir! Wir schlagen ein Loch hinein! Danach sehen wir weiter!" (I vehemently refuse the word strategy! We blow a hole into the line! Then we'll see!")
What was needed to turn the odds in favor of the Germans was a brillant strategist and a well thought out operational plan! .
xxstefanx 7 months ago
@Andish08
Historical consensus is that it was not effective despite the biggest territorial gains since 1914. It ought to be concepted for decision, but instead ran out of steam in nomansland!
In fact, the Michael offensive was plagued by Ludendorff not realizing Amiens as THE operational - and decisive (!)- goal from the outset. Foch on the contrary was well aware of the situation and even brought up reinforcements behind the British lines!
There was a famous conversation between ...
xxstefanx 7 months ago
From 00:55 it "Drei lilien", a German song. Does anyone know where can I find this particular version?
SIEGFFFF 8 months ago
@ElliotWrightMusic BBC made in the 1960s I think
vetdino 9 months ago
@Andiish08 This offensive was brilliantly effective but it could never have broken the naval blockade which was starving Germany.
Withnail1969 10 months ago
may I know when this set of documentaries was made, and by whom? I've really enjoyed them - thank you for posting!
ElliotWrightMusic 1 year ago