Seven Spiritual Law of Pure Potential Meditation

Chopra Certified instructor Rick Freeman guides you through a simple meditation with a focus on Deepak Chopra's Seven Spiritual Laws of Success and Seven Spiritual Laws of Yoga.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• meditate
• meditation
• chopra
• center
• seven
• spiritual
• laws
• of
• success
• deepak
• pure
• potential

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog Watching a debate doesnt count ,read greatest show(as I say just to show that you have been fair)

Take a closer look at the statement these doctors are in support of. Notice that the statement does not say that these scientists think the theory of evolution is wrong, it doesn't even say that they disagree with it on a personal level. Just that they are skeptical of it, and believe it should be subjected to testing rather than accepted on faith.I agree.Thats why they have

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog The woman came out of man,thats not scientific ,you do not understand evo,are you STILL going on about how it had to happen at the same time(I can see why)because the female parts were FIRST,it started with self reproduction then SPLIT up ,your list stinks,half have no expertise in the field.NO reproductive organs didnt mutate at the same time,you are just as stupid as comfort.Read greatest show on earth,even if you hate dawkins,at least youll be able to say you've read both sides

[Ramohog]

@VaiRoth I always hear both sides and I have heard all the big debates. Look for the list of scientist on dissentfromdarwin . org. Of course there are structural similarities. A man has everything it takes to be a woman, but not the other way around. The woman came out of man, on the side close, to hearth under the protective arm. But to think reproductive organs mutated at the exact same time takes quite some faith. Evolutionist are still spiritually blind and in denial!

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog Evidence that sex evolved can be discerned in the extensive structural similarities between men and women, even in the parts that show sexual dimorphism. A creator could start from scratch for each sex; evolution could not.If this doesnt at least jog a twinkle of a thought in you(no-one's asking you to quit jesus if it does) then at least say so,so that I dont waste my time on deaf ears.

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog You're talking about meyer and behe with the "hurricane in a junkyard" and the irreducable complexity canards arnt you Ram?See the problem here is you're suffering from : "I wont question any "scientist"that tries to make a case for Jesus and Ill flatly ignore even blatant facts so long as they're from the "opposition" syndrome.This is called:being closed minded .If you do not make the effort to hear both sides(like scientists do with EACH OTHER) you will be considered one sided

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog Which real scientists?Always the special pleading,please explain how they have debunked evolution,also provide irrefutable proof that the illuminati exist,and solid proof that Oxford university is a breeding ground for mind controlled deception.One thing is dead certain,no matter what evidence is presented to you,it will not suffice,you are no more intelligent than Wendy Wright.

You never got an answer because you never looked,always looking on apologetics sites to confirm your faith

[Ramohog]

How did they evolve at the same time. I never got a good answer on that. Evolution is debunked by real scientist, who are not afraid to speak out against it and lose their funding. You can compare it with the global warming scam. Both are debunked deception in order to lead people astray. Oxford university is an illuminati breading ground for mind control deception. Dawkins is a good product of left brain knowledge based mind control, totally lacking right brain wisdom.... screwed up thinking!

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog You failed twice in the 1st 2 sentences

[VaiRoth]

@Ramohog Hovind is not a scientist,he has a "degree" in christian apologetics from a university comprising a run down house where they basically hand you a degree.Dawkins is a proper scientist,live with it.And no you dont know how evo works 1) its not survival of the fittest,its survival of the most readily adaptable 2)Evolution makes no claims as to the arrival of life,thats abiogenesis and 3)you asked me how a male and female(lifeform)happened to evolve at the same time understand,my ass

[Ramohog]

@VaiRoth I fully understand evolution. It perfectly explains survival of the fittest but not the arrival. She was not a scientist. Dawkins refused to debate Hovind, because he knew he would lose. He is also dramatic on a philosophical level. Hovind refused to pay taxes to a corrupted system. He actaully went against God's Word on that, and suffered the consequences.