Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

John Gibson agrees on New 9-11 w Bykofsky

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,304
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 1, 2008

{PLEASE READ COMMENT}

John Gibson asked in 2007 if a "new 9-11" bloodbath on random Americans would help coax us into more jingo wingnut political views, i.e. support Bush and support the War(s).

They agree it would be good, with minor azz-covering.

On another clip, Gibson mocks Jon Stewart and implores "we NEED a new 9-11".

Do THESE "patriots" LOVE America or HATE America?
Wanting your country to be attacked, is that patriotic?

---
THE MAIN REASON I POSTED THIS VIDEO is to highlight other story on how "spokesmen" from AEI and PNAC wanted America to be attacked, before 9-11.

These men are actually "policy makers", who work *inside* the Pentagon and Intell. Look up bio of Richard Perle and Michael Ledeen. Look up members of PNAC. Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, many big names.

Ledeen spoke of a "LUCKY" BLOODBATH on America. PNAC said it was NECESSARY for their big plans, back in 1999.

Unfortunately, that's in writing not on TV. Ron Paul (I'm not a 'Paultard'), in his "Neo-Conned" speech, quotes Michael Ledeen:

"We could always get Lucky ..." and get hit "like on Pearl Harbor" which "woke us from our soothing dreams of neutrality". Ledeen believes in Permanent War as a way of life, and a Global Waffen SS.

HOW MUCH DOES IT DISTURB YOU that our top "anti-terrorism experts" on TV and working in the White House directly for Bush were lobbying *FOR* terrorism on America in 1999 and 2000?

Does it disturb you that NOBODY talks about this? Not even most "Truthers"?

http://www.Takeoverworld.info/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • john gibson keeps trying to get that guy to say we need another 9/11. hes touching himself under the table...

  • Maybe its true. If people like these two "Americans" and other diabolical sociopaths who covet war as a fast track to success were under attack, it would probably result in a lot more "unification" then anything they would ever desire for the American people.

  • Grumpy,

    Hurray for you. I'm not being sarcastic.

    Since I don't have Ledeen on vid calling for a 'lucky and providential new Pearl Harbor' or Perle calling for 'a catastrophic and catalyzing event like Pearl Harbor' or a vid of Brzezinski saying democratic societies like ours oppose imperial war EXCEPT with a massive threat like Pearl Harbor -- ALL IN WRITING b4 9-11 -- this is my spotlight on those who had the INTENT and MEANS to make 9-11 an inside job, not Al-CIAda. see my homepage

  • Of course that's what it means--I know that. That's exactly what Gibsons think we need to do, so that we will go ripping up the world in a muderous, fanatical rage. He also thinks that another 9/11 will be the perfect way to accomplish this mindstate.

    When I said "remember 9/11" I meant remember the people who died, and remember how, right after it (before Bush's crap) we came together to help each other, all differences gone. THAT's what we should remember--not vicious patriotic fervor.

  • Grumpy,

    The "remember 9-11" fetish means "remain transfixed in a state of rage and fear". Straussians say to control people use religion and patriotism, andor fear.

    My real point is a large group of people in interconnected PR think tanks also stated that we NEEDED to be attacked, that a bloodbath in America was VITAL and would be a BLESSING, but they wrote that ONE TO TWO YEARS BEFORE 9-11.

    None have been investigated.

    Some were *advisors* to Pentagon and Bush, seen on Fox and CNN.

  • Hi Botchalism,

    I posted that vid where Grumpy replied to you in a nasty tone.

    My real point, see my comments, is that several Americans -- a large group of several interconnected PR think tanks -- also stated that we NEEDED to be attacked, that a bloodbath in America was VITAL and would be a BLESSING, but they wrote that ONE TO TWO YEARS BEFORE 9-11.

    Yet none of them have been investigated.

    Not only that, they are *advisors* to the Pentagon and to Bush, feat on Fox and on CNN.

  • I beg your pardon? I just said that it was a horrible, hellish tragedy. I think that Gibson is a horrible, disgusting sick fucker for thinking we need another 9/11. So basically, you agree completely with me and still are bashing me because you need to bash someone and are disappointed to see that everyone here is sane, so you take it out anyway on someone who isn't a sick fuck. YOU take your meds.

  • Umm, I never want to feel the way I did after 9/11 nor do I want to know what feelings a sick asshole like yourself felt afterwards. Yeah that's what we NEED, like the economy wasn't bad enough we NEED another global catastrophe, take your meds.

  • In another Gibson clip, he says "we NEED another 9/11!" Eager to bash Fox? Maybe we all agree, another 9/11 would be GREAT!!

    My other point was to highlight other people who said in BLACK AND WHITE (not on TV) before 9/11 that America needs such an attack as a new Pearl Harbor. That it would be LUCKY if America was hit like P.H.

    Who said that? Top Pentagon planners on the Defense Policy Board (and on PNAC) and top National Anti-Terror advisor, Michael Ledeen, Richard Perle, etc.

  • Fuck these bitches. Put them up against a wall and shoot'em. same goes for westboro baptist church, burn the mother fucker to the ground.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more