@pieappen91 WOW. Atp synthase is completely different from this motor, in all forms. You must definitely NOT be a biochemistry student if you think that.
I don't understand what the big deal is. All this guy is explaining is that a biochemist, aka a scientist, gave him his perception on how some organisms, like bacteria, are very well engineered. So well, that it makes him question if a higher intelligence could have been the creator. Also, let's get something straight, not all science has been proven. A lot of it, if not most, is purely theoretical. So unless you have studied, researched, and have proof of such things as evolution, which I pers
@gear14 Most of science isn't proven? False.
JohnnyBoy12222 1 day ago
@pieappen91 WOW. Atp synthase is completely different from this motor, in all forms. You must definitely NOT be a biochemistry student if you think that.
cowboys430isback 1 week ago
Great video my friend
cowboys430isback 1 week ago
That motor is actually a modified form of ATP Synthase. So yes, it did have a precursor.
pieappen91 3 weeks ago
you have some great stuff here
sprattysy 4 weeks ago
some great inforamtion here thanks
simysimss 1 month ago
good work here
rodswebdesign 1 month ago
i enjoyed this vid
jayejayeee 1 month ago
I don't understand what the big deal is. All this guy is explaining is that a biochemist, aka a scientist, gave him his perception on how some organisms, like bacteria, are very well engineered. So well, that it makes him question if a higher intelligence could have been the creator. Also, let's get something straight, not all science has been proven. A lot of it, if not most, is purely theoretical. So unless you have studied, researched, and have proof of such things as evolution, which I pers
gear14 1 month ago
@ndrthrdr1 LOL your stupidity amuses me.
88pie88 1 month ago