Has history been tampered with? Yes, it has! Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire , the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, actually occur within a very different chronology from what we've been told? Yes, they certainly did!
CLICK ON AMAZON.COM LINK!
The history of humankind is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed.
Why is it so? On one hand, it was usual custom to justify the claims to title and land by age and ancestry, and on the other the court historians knew only too well how to please their masters. The so called universal classic world history is a pack of intricate lies for all events prior to the 16th century. There is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that is reliably and independently dated prior to the 11th century. Naturally, after what you've learned in school and university, you will point accusing finger to the pyramids in Egypt, to the Coliseum in Rome and Great Wall of China etc., and claim, aren't they really ancient, thousands of years ancient? Well, there is no valid scientific proof that they are older than 1000 years! New research asserts that Homo sapiens invented writing (including hieroglyphics) only 1000 years ago. Once invented, writing skills were immediately and irreversibly put to the use of ruling powers and science. The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the 16th century by Jesuits. Ancient history is based on documents, manuscripts, printed books, paintings, monuments and artefacts called primary sources. The problem is that neither these primary sources, nor events described therein can be irrefutably dated, moreover they contradict each other for the most part.
When a school textbook tells us that Genghis Khan in year X or Alexander in year Y, have each conquered half of the world, it means only that it is so said in some of the written sources.
There are no answers to simple questions:
When were these primary sources written?
Where and by whom were these primary sources found?
It is presumed that ancient and medieval chronicles, written by Genghis Khan's or Alexander the Great contemporaries and eyewitnesses, are readily available. Actually, only sources written hundreds or even thousands of years after the events are there, compiled mostly in the 16th 18th centuries, or even later.
As a rule, these sources suffered considerable multiple manipulations, falsifications and distortions by editing. At the same time,
innumerable originals of ancient documents were destroyed in Europe under various pretexts.
The names of persons and geographical sites often changed meaning and location during the course of the centuries.
Geographical locations became clearly defined on maps only with the advent of printing.
This made possible the circulation of identical copies of the same map for purposes of the military, navigation, education and governance tasks.
Historians from Oxford say: "hey, everybody knows that Julius Caesar lived in the first century B.C.
'Julius Caesar' statement is only a point of view as
there is simply no irrefutable documentary proof that Julius Caesar or any other great name of antiquity ever existed.
Better than that - extremely rare sources that can be reliably dated back to the 10th 14th centuries A D, do not show the polished picture of classical history.
They show a picture both contradictory and confusing.
Historians disdainfully label such sources as unfortunate concoctions of half illiterate monks, hermits and travellers.
All methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts are erroneous:
Radio-carbon C14 method produces dating with exactitude of plus minus 1500 years, therefore it is too crude for dating of events in historical timeframe!
The Almagest tractate, which lies as corner stone contemporary chronology, compiled in the 2nd century A D by Ptolemy, the founding father of astronomy, contains astronomical data of 9th to 16th century!
The Bronze Age, that has supposedly began 5000 years ago. Bronze is made of 90% copper and 10% tin, but the technology for tin extraction dates back 14th century A D!
All eclipses contained in manuscripts, like Thucydides one, relating 'ancient' events have exclusively medieval dating.
All horoscopes cut in stone or painted in Egyptian temples, like Dendera have exclusively early medieval dating solutions. Not quite what you have learned in school? Open your eyes, and, you will find sufficient proof to reach step by step the inevitable conclusion that the classical chronology is false and therefore, that the history of ancient and medieval world universally accepted today, is also false. Antiquity and Dark Ages are phantoms invented in the 16th 18th and polished in 19th 20th centuries. Human civilization is barely 1000 years old!
Loading...
I have travelled too far into the woo, am returning to the real world.
Sloan001962 2 weeks ago
@JNathanK2011 Well, except that the wiggle room on carbon dating is 1500 years. So that parchment could be from 500 years ago. OR 3500!
jackdtroughton 4 weeks ago
I would expect you to provide some evidence for your beliefs but you provide nothing. This video is just a bunch of accusations with no proof for rebuttle. What a joke.
MrJoeVig 3 months ago
@Hawkmoon51 Yes, history is being re-written everyday, and what you grow up learning in school is carefully selected by boards to train your brain (to what they want you to know). Bet you'll get the crock of shit explanation of 9/11 from the powers that be in your schools (if it isn't already). Which makes you wonder what, and who wrote what back when! The Talmud was written when - YEAH RIGHT - what a crock of shit! You're in a stage-play/game... it's all been fabricated for it!!
greg12145 3 months ago
The history if human civilization is more likely a lot longer. You have these stone structures around the world underwater that had to have been built during the last ice age. The thesis is partially true, but its ass backward from what it really is. Radio Carbon Dating of 2000 year old parchments from ancient Rome pretty much blows this all out of the water.
JNathanK2011 3 months ago
We all have our own views on how the world is...but honestly and im only speaking for myself, i say that we cannot judge...only He can.
that is all
checkithe 3 months ago
Look dude..I don't blame ya for tryin to make a dime..but anyone that would give this a honest take is clueless.Lets look at it from a logical POV.So your saying that in a 1000 yrs cycle Mankind evolved into all the different races and spread out and populated the Earth?Do the Math !It's impossible.You need to support your idea with Facts,not questions.History is being re-written everyday.that part is true,but the facts are Mankind is much OLDER than first thought,NOT the other way around.
Hawkmoon51 4 months ago
Look dude..I don't blame ya for tryin to make a dime..but anyone that would give this a honest take is clueless.Lets look at it from a logical POV.So your saying that in a 1000 yrs cycle Mankind evolved into all the different races and spread out and populated the Earth?Do the Math FFS!It's impossible.You need to support your idea with Facts,not questions.History is being re-written everyday.that part is true,but the facts are Mankind is much OLDER than first thought,NOT the other way around.
Hawkmoon51 4 months ago
How the fuck is human civilization only 1000 years old and we are in year 2011, and then the years b.c., and your dumb if u believe history is fake, we wuldnt have currency and government in the world, remember no guns were used back then so heroes are known as warriors skilled fighters why wuld they invent such a person........aha in that case science is fake? nd math, and everything else that came from the past -_-
skimo807 4 months ago
@truthhitmanisback Are you really really suggesting that the people who know more and are brighter and better educated are the people who know less are stupid and are not better educated?
Personally I wouldn't enter into a conversation or debate where my argument was 'I'm right cos I'm wrong' that doesn't cast you in a very good light.
You take your personal history of a poor education seriously. Too seriously to rectify it from what I'm reading. Its never too late to educate yourself.
Unrealistix 4 months ago