Joseph Smith as My Example for Exploring the Book of Mormon

I give some very interesting reasons for using Joseph Smith s my model of intellectual learning about the Book of Mormon this year.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Joseph Smith
• Book of Mormon
• Mormon
• Mormons
• Mormonism

[IExposeMormonism]

JS said of Reformed Egyptian "by the power of God I translated the BofM from hieroglyphs, the knowledge of which had been Lost To The Ages". Question: Why then did JS send Martin to Anthon? Anthon couldn't read Hieroglyphs, only Champollion had done that. He taught no American that skill. If JS has Gods power, why go to a professor who Can't interpret Egyptian, much less Reformed Egyptian. JS says Anthon Confirmed Reformed Egyptian characters were also Chaldaic, Assyriac, Arabic. WHY oh Why?

[TheBackyardProfessor]

@IExposeMormonism

All of this is explored on the Neal A. Maxwell Institute's website. I suggest you read up on it all. There are many studies on this available for all, and it's free. Ignorance is no longer a viable alternative.....

[TheSkepticChristian]

@IExposeMormonism Your accusations full of nonsense bored me, that's why I want to talk about organic evolution or the Big Bang, Science is cool

lol Come on, it's okay to admit that you were wrong.

Okay, I will say this one more time:

Joseph Smith recorded Martin's account. Martin said that ACCORDING to Anthon, the interpretation was correct. Anthon was able to confirm the characters, but he didn't really confirmed the translation like he claimed.

[IExposeMormonism]

@TheSkepticChristian You alone changed the subject from reformed Egyptian to Organic Evolution. I have JS words and Anthons in front of me. I have not misquoted them. You are just wrong... JS states that Anthon DID corroborated the interpretation. Period Paragraph End of Report. Bye Adieu Ciao Adios

[TheSkepticChristian]

@IExposeMormonism I proven that you are dishonest. You changed the issue for convenience. We were talking about Anton.

Look, I don't care if Mormon dosen't mean "More-Good". Joseph Smith was not perfect, he made mistakes, like all Biblical Prophets. As for Arabic..ect, Anton was able to recognized the Egyptian Characters, not decipher them. I quoted Joseph accuratly, you failed to completly quote him, and provide a referense.

Enough, I want peer-reviewed Papers.

[IExposeMormonism]

@TheSkepticChristian More-Good has everything to do with reformed Egyptian. When JS said "more",he introduced English into the equation. Along with "Arabic.....etc". You have been unable to follow a simple example using JS own words. You've misquoted him. I have accurately quoted him and corrected you. Now, if you'll forgive me, I must go. Bye, Ciao, Adios, Adieu.

[TheSkepticChristian]

@IExposeMormonism More-Good issue has nothing to do with Anthon, it's a totally different issue. We were talking about Anton.

You believe Anton told the truth, I believe he lied, yet Anton contradicts himself in two letters he send on this issue.

Anyways, you are confused, you probably don't understand what I am telling you.

Your bias will never allow you to publish a peer-reviewed Paper on History.

Bye Bye, just keep your anti-mormon nonsense out of politics, please.

[IExposeMormonism]

@TheSkepticChristian You are such a perfect Mormon! I have quoted JS accurately from beginning to end. This is the end. Perhaps I'll make another video on this subject. You can read it yourself. Anthon Never said the correction was correct. He contradicts JS. And Martin just seems to keep his mouth shut. More-Good. Goes to Reformed Egyptian, why does JS say MORMON comes from the contraction of More, an English Word. It's JS own statement. Bye Bye. Ciao, Adieu.

[TheSkepticChristian]

@IExposeMormonism Joseph wrote Martin's account, it was Martin that said that Anton said it.

Why can't you quote again when Joseph Smith supposedly said that Anton really did confirm the translation for a fact?

It was Anton himself, that said that the translation was correct, without actually knowing.

So can you quote please?? Just like I have quoted??

The "more-good" issue, has nothing to do with Anton.

LOL why do you want to destroy my church so bad??

You don't have rational reasons.

[IExposeMormonism]

@TheSkepticChristian I've quoted JS words through out. You're pitiful in your confusion. Martin left no record. JS did. I have faithfully quoted it. One more question: Since we "know" the letters are "Assyriac.." etc. And JS says "Mon" is Egyptian and means good.. and More or Mor is English. And thus Mormon means "more-good". English is c325AD. Egyptian, reformed or not, is much earlier. Further, there was never cultural contact. How did this linguistic Siamese Twin occur?

[TheSkepticChristian]

@IExposeMormonism Dude, you are confused.

Martin said that Anton said:

"he said that they were Egyptian, Chaldaic, Assyriac, and Arabic; and he said they were true characters"

Anton was able to recognize the characters.

"Professor Anthon stated that the translation was correct"

The translation was correct, but Anton didn't really verify it, he lied.

Those are the facts, you failed to quote, and you misunderstood everything I been telling you.

[IExposeMormonism]

@TheSkepticChristian Where Did I quote JS? From the beginning, you ninny. go back and read the comments. JS said Anthon CONFIRMED the glyphs AND the interpretation. Anthon denies that he confirmed anything. JS produced a paper with "letters" on it. Even BYP has used it. JS says Anthon says the letters were "Syrriac...." etc. Anthon says they were Greek and Roman with modifications on them. He saw no hieroglyphs. I'm tired of repeating myself I should charge you $ for this