JFK Assassination-A new look at the evidence part 1

Evidence many have never seen in the JFK assassination. Featuring photos, video, and documents depicting the evidence in the most important crime in history, this video is simple enough for anyone to understand. No crazy conspiracy theories, just reasonable questions and observations. I make no claims of being an expert-I am just someone who has been interested in this subject for many years and noticed some issues that most others are not discussing. Feel free to comment, but flames and insults will be deleted. I must approve all comments, so if you don't see your comment wait a day or so and your comment will appear.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jfk
• assassination
• conspiracy
• oswald
• patsy
• warren
• report
• zapruder
• ballistics
• fbi

[tyrusvirus1]

Clearly the shot came from behind due to the fact it was the front portion of his head that blew away. If a shot came from the front, the back of his head would have been blown off. Also if the shot was to have come from the grassy knoll, the opposite side of his head would have blown off. I don't understand why people deny thins even though it is on film

[cyberwing777]

@tyrusvirus1 you can't go by just one piece of evidence-you have to take into account other pieces of evidence such as the 40 or so people at Parkland Hospital who said that JFK's wound was in the back of his head. When I watch the Zapruder film, I see a point of entry at the right temple and brain matter exiting out the back. The two motorcycle officers to JFK's back left got hit in the face with brain matter and blood, and one parked his bike and run up the hill to the stockade fence.

[camelot28]

I think you are right cyberwing777. The skull is not JFK. Take a look at what the young doctor who attended JFK in Dallas hospital has said. The arms of power can cover anything, nothing we can do.

[cyberwing777]

@camelot28 and the guy that took the x-rays says these are not the ones he took. It all adds up to a whitewash by the WC.

[rlipil]

let's see now...u don't know what something in the x-ray is, and ur not a skilled physician, and massive head wound analysis demands a lot of expertise, and there's countless more of those experts who don't support conspiracy than those who do, yet u have the smoking gun...see where i'm going here. get over urself. there's no case to crack; that in fact is the real conspiracy.

[cyberwing777]

@rlipil I'm allowing your condescending post so I can respond. I am not an expert, which I plainly state in my videos. I do however, rely on experts such as the Parkland doctors who all state there was a massive wound in the back of JFK's head. I actually met one of them and spoke with him, as I did FBI agent Vince Drain. I don't need to 'get over myself', thank you very much. I have my opinions and something called free speech. If you're such a genius, where are your videos, smartass?

[jdarby0788]

i heard on one video that the metallic substance in the side x ray was mercury....... also read about an assassin who said he used a mercury filled round when he shot kennedy in the head, look up James Files, pretty interesting stuff!

[zacksutt]

Nice work. I have had the same questions for a while now.

[KayKayon]

you really do have good arguements and I agree with everything you have stated. The Warren Commission was a load of crap and I seriously cannot believe they gave their conclusions to the world when there are many inconistencies in there. Great Video

[smartcooky99]

Oswald is supposed to have used a Carcano M91/38 - 6.5mm bolt-action rifle with a 4x scope, rifle notorious for two faults; 1. bolt action jams, especially when operating the action quickly, and 2. Hard extractions, where the casing expands in the breech and partially jams, especially on third 3rd and subsequent shots during rapid fire. He is supposed to have aimed and fired three shots in 5.6 seconds (max) at a moving target 88 to 120 yards away. Very difficult, even for a good shooter.

[390bullitt1968]

Allow me to skip over all of this for a second. Let's assume a few bigtime insiders came forward and said it was a conspiracy. What would happen? would LBJ have been asked to step aside form the office and a new election held? I mean, lets go beyond what we all know to be true. It was a hit. LBJ has some info it would happen.do the powerful ever get put on trial?

[Exiles800]

Apparently Lone Nutters think the smell of gunpowder somehow doesn't indicate a smoking gun. We know Bernard Barker was behind the fence and came out to present a phony Secret Service ID provided by CIA insiders. FBI found Ruby's phone called NY mobster Joe Cataldo in July. Lone Nutters are finished as soon as they are unable to answer how Oswald knew about obscure CIA-connected Albert Schweitzer College in Switzerland? You can't be unable to answer that and still have credibility.

[gentle7ways7]

@tyrusvirus1 depends on the bullet that was used,if it was a fragmentation it would explode on impact so therefore it would have come from the front,don't forget there were witness accounts of the gun fire from the grassy knoll spot yet they were ignored one guy threw himself down and heard the bullet whizz past his ear

[N1k1mon]

@humberlick It's very difficult to pinpoint one single reason why Kennedy was murdered. He was going to print his own money, infuriating the Fed and bankers et al. Bobby and him were determined to stomp on organized crime, he was going to withdraw from Vietnam, LBJ had his own reasons, he'd fired a lot of high ups including Dulles as well as NOT being a Freemason. There were scores of people who would have loved to take him out, I think this is why there is so much cross cooperation involved.

[cruisersism]

@tyrusvirus1 Hello!!!!!

[1239jer]

Inconsistency 1: most people who discuss "basic physics" when it comes to the assassination obviously don't know basic physics! A 200-gram bullet traveling 2,000 fps hitting a 12-pound head would cause a transfer of momentum of 1 to 2 inches, not the 10 inches or so here. The most likely explanation is a neuromuscular reaction.