9/11 Common Sense
Uploader Comments (christogarcia)
Video Responses
All Comments (33)
-
This guy knows what he's talking about, not like that drinkingwithbob retard guy
-
they are not trying to create any one world currency, as they control all banks. these people are way past all that. as long as all of us are poor, they can make anything happen through bribes. remember, they have been the banking industry for millenia.
"save your baby's life" -R. Nesta Marley
-
Has anyone ever told you that explosions are followed by noise? If someone watches a video ,with audio, of any of the 3 buildings collapsing, they should come to the conclusion that you are not very qualified to make controlled demolition claims. Any real experts or professionals that you could direct me to?
-
Well said!
Clearly there has been a cover-up about the truth of 9/11.
Occam's Razor would suggest the simplest explanation for a cover-up is guilt.
-
Very good video. I wouldn't doubt that it is precisely because you do such a credible job of explaining 911 that a bunch idiots or disinfo agents are trying to discourage you with their attacks. My advice is not to spend too much time arguing with these people. We should concentrate on those that are capable of seeing the truth when it is presented to them.
-
great video, keep posting.
-
My name is Wayne Walton and I'm a 9.11 truther too.
The fear peddlers and population control oligarchs are running out of schemes.
Wow, all the CT-bullshit compressed into slightly over two and a half minutes. Respect, kook!
Hochdorff 2 years ago
Thank you for the compliment. Now, if you or anyone else can give me an adequate reason for the collapse of Building 7 I greatly appreciate it. And, if you search for the photo of the Oklahoma City bombing ask yourself, "Why didn't that building disappear into nothing but powder and dust?"
Remaining willfully ignorant endangers all Americans.
christogarcia 2 years ago
This is easy: Heavy structural damage from falling debris, long lasting fires feed out of fuel tanks over several floors and finally the unique design of the building. Before it fell everybody on the scene expected it to fall, because it was leaning. Hence firefighters established a collapse zone and watched the what they have seen coming.
Btw. did you realize the Oklahama City building didn't fell (if I remember correctly). Additionally both buildings didn't "disappear into nothing...".
Hochdorff 2 years ago
Hahaha! Thank you for proving my point.
The building in OKLAHOMA didn't collapse because skyscrapers don't fall straight down! They must resist gravity of all things. They can't fall straight down without planned assistance! If you look at the comprehensive damage to the Murrah building in Oklahoma, it so far EXCEEDS any damage we saw from the planes on 9/11, and what the falling debris did to Building 7.
All wake you up when it's all over.
christogarcia 2 years ago
Yep, that's your method, taking one snippet, that alledgedly proves your claim and ignore all other things said.
The Oklahoma City building had a bomb placed on the outside, it had no damage prior and the fireworker could contain the fire. In addition it lacked the unique design of WTC 7. This is why it didn't collapse.
4,800 pounds didn't caused it to collapse, so how many must be planted to bring WTC 7 down? The explosion could be heard and felt 55 miles away, nobody heard such on 9/11.
Hochdorff 2 years ago
My method is called the Scientific Method which begins with observation. Building 7 was a 47 story building that was not impacted by a plane. It collapsed into it's own footprint, straight down through the PATH OF MAXIMUM RESISTANCE without any hindrance whatsoever. Shock waves and explosive charges ripples up the sides of the structure.
If it helps you sleep at night, keep believing the government's story. I hope selling out your country is worth it.
christogarcia 2 years ago