@jjenson2006 I hate to disappoint you, but I couldn't care less about making points with you. My goal was to prove your arrogant statement wrong, which I've done, so good day to you as well. :-)
@jjenson2006 The encoders in a mouse are quadrature encoders. How do you think the computer knows what direction the mouse is moving in? More magic I suppose! (SRS)
@jjenson2006 All totally irrelevant, he could have a 1000:1 ratio between the motor and the encoder if he wanted, it wouldn't matter. His leadscrew doesn't turn at the speed or number of degrees that the motor does. (SIGH)
@jjenson2006 I hate to disappoint you, but I couldn't care less about making points with you. My goal was to prove your arrogant statement wrong, which I've done, so good day to you as well. :-)
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 I was only making light of another of your plethora of false statements! SRS
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 So again, you admit you were wrong! SRS
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 Backpedal quick!
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 Careful now, you're confusing yourself.
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 The encoders in a mouse are quadrature encoders. How do you think the computer knows what direction the mouse is moving in? More magic I suppose! (SRS)
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 All totally irrelevant, he could have a 1000:1 ratio between the motor and the encoder if he wanted, it wouldn't matter. His leadscrew doesn't turn at the speed or number of degrees that the motor does. (SIGH)
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 Your ignorance of this subject is laughable!
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 Again, you are simply wrong, but I can see you lack the ability to ever understand that. I give up, you win!
dabealtis 1 year ago
@jjenson2006 The resolution has never been a question. Here you go trying to "morph" the discussion again. (SIGH)
dabealtis 1 year ago