Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

To Be or Not To Be

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
590 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 23, 2008

The Hamlet monologue from Act 3, Scene 1.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheLogicJunkie)

  • BRAVO! for so with the sleep be a thousand injustice,Yeah that rips and tears at the mortal mind as if to prove the foul taste for the mortal coil

  • I'd actually like to do it, like an infomercial for an audience, or an on-the-scene exposee reporter.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ah, now THERE'S a concept i can agree with. i think he could give that diversity within the speech, not necessarily with ease, but i think he could definitely sell it. sell the entire concept, the feeling that hamlet is experiencing through this speech. i can see it now...

    thank you for the conversation. i really think the two of us came to an agreeable comprimise =]

  • True, true... I wonder if Anthony Hopkins could deliver those parts with a dead, peaceful smile.

  • i can definitely see that, but also in the "to die, to sleep..." parts it seems to me that contemplation takes a more serious tone, while when he says "ay, there's the rub" its almost as if he's making a mockery out of life with that cynicism and mundaneness that you captured so well. it's not really complicated, but there is a certain depth to it, while there are definitely parts where he disregards humanity and life in a very critical way.

  • It's the kind of speech that I imagine would be given by 1) Bill Hicks or 2) Howard Beale from "Network" or 3) Heath Ledger's Joker...

  • understood, seeing as how it almost has a sneer to it. however, there are parts of it where i think "melodrama" is necessary, seeing as how there are several parts of it where he stops to seriously think about the upsides of being dead, as opposed to the rest of it where he brutally criticizes life. i dunno if its just me or if there's an actual difference or even if im making sense, but it almost seems necessary to give it that clash of melodrama and cynicism.

  • Thanks.

    As I studied the speech, I tried to put aside the dramatic tradition of how it's supposed to be said, and discovered that it's a very matter-of-fact kind of cynical lecture to the audience. There's really no need for melodrama... in fact, I think it could be even more effectively delivered in the same manner as a mundane Powerpoint lecture.

  • this is very interesting. very different from what im used to, but definitely good. im used to it being very thoughtful, very slow, very deliberate, and somehow unnatural, while the way you speak it seems to bring a certain cynicism about the soliloquy. as i said, i like it. very different.

    =]

  • Slaughterbaby.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more