The Pentagon Security Camera on 911 (Part 2)

Is that really Flight 77 in the Pentagon security camera?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• wtc
• trade
• tower
• pentagon
• flight
• 77
• conspiracy
• security
• camera

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

"And I came out in what is to believed to be the entrance or the place of initial impact..While I was coming out of the Pentagon, I didn't see any evidence of metal, airplane seats, luggage, nothing that would give me any indication that it was a plane that had hit the building. I didn't have jet fuel all over my body. My son didn't have jet fuel all over his body. The people that I helped didn't have jet fuel all over their body"-Pentagon worker April Gallop

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

Officially, 4,900 lb of jet fuel was involved in the fire at the time of impact outside the building. And 30,400 lb of jet fuel entered the building. Cameraman was on scene approx. 10 mins after impact. Since the fire was well under with workers within a few feet of the impact hole in Pugh's video, did they put out this fire in 10 mins? And worker April Gallop walked directly thru the hole and saw no plane parts or jet fuel? Your theory on this?

watch?v=-xtEJ4zrIPM

[PostalCode74]

@muzicmaker2001 First, the fire damage was on the 1st an 2nd floors only according to the official theory. Look at pictures of the Pentagon after the event and you'll fire damage on those floors, but only soot on the upper floors.

Now please tell me what you think hit the pentagon. I've ben waiting long enough.

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

By blind, I mean you are blind to the majority of what you call evidence. For example, have you seen the DNA report? How about the autopsy report? A confirmation of ANY of the wreckage? One body identified as a passenger? A body identified as a hijacker? Any evidence of the cockpit, wings, tail section, or both engines? One chair out of 239 on-board? And evidence of a massive fire/burn damage from 5000 gals of jet fuel? No to all? Doesn't sound concrete to me at all..

[PostalCode74]

@muzicmaker2001 I did not just blimdly exept the theory. I looked at evedence that i could find and came to the same conclusion as the official report.

Now, what's your alternative theory?

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

Interesting logic you have there. If ALL of the physical evidence points to another theory, just blindly accept the theory that's presented to you? And you mentioned science earlier. Wow!!

[PostalCode74]

@muzicmaker2001 No idea? You can't attack a theory if you don't have an alternate one.

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

No idea, but its obviously not a 155 ft long 757, right?

[PostalCode74]

@muzicmaker2001 And what do you think it is?

[muzicmaker2001]

@PostalCode74

This did..

watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs