Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

911 IN PLANE SITE (Full Length HQ FR) Conspiracy Theories

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,441
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 11, 2011

Excellent documentaire de Dave VonKleist sur les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 avec des sous-titres en français.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9/11 10th Anniversary Tribute - September 11, 2001
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Various 9/11 conspiracy theories question the official account of the events of September 11, 2001, and arose because of what proponents of these theories believe to be inconsistencies in the official conclusions or some evidence that was overlooked.[1][2][3][4]

Forty-two percent of Americans in a 2006 Zogby poll were critical of the official version of 9/11 events, believing the federal government and the 9/11 commission had "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks," and that "there has been a cover-up."[3] A Zogby poll in 2007 found that:

31 perecent of likely voters do not buy the official 9/11 story [72 percent for ages 18 to 24 and nearly 60 percent for Hispanics and singles]; 51 percent still await a congressional investigation of Bush's and Cheney's actions before, during and after the 9/11 attacks [88 percent for ages 18 to 24 and 77 percent for Hispanics and singles]; and 67% fault the 9/11 Commission for not investigating the anomalous and still unexplained collapse of World Trade Center building 7.[5]
In a 2008 poll in 17 countries, 15% of those surveyed believed the US government was responsible for the attacks, 7% believed Israel was and another 7% believed some other perpetrator, other than al Qaeda, was responsible. The poll found that respondents in the Middle East were more likely to name a perpetrator other than al Qaeda.[6]

The most prominent conspiracy theory is that the collapse of the World Trade Center and 7 World Trade Center were the result of a controlled demolition rather than structural weakening due to fire.[7][8] Another prominent belief is that the Pentagon was hit by a missile launched by elements from inside the U.S. government[9][10] or that a commercial airliner was allowed to do so via an effective standdown of the American military.[11][12] Motives cited by conspiracy theorists include justifying the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and geostrategic interests in the Mideast, including pipeline plans launched in the early 1990s by Unocal and other oil companies.[13]

Published reports and articles by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the magazine Popular Mechanics, and the mainstream media accept that the impacts of jet aircraft at high speeds in combination with subsequent fires, rather than controlled demolition, led to the collapse of the Twin Towers.[14][15] Zdeněk Bažant and Mathieu Verdure, writing in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, propose that collapse can be triggered if the total internal energy loss during the crushing of one story exceeds the kinetic energy impacted to that story.[16]
(Wikipedia) September, 11 th 2011

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • so because YOU can't figure out what the government did with a plane full of people and you CAN CAPITALIZE YOUR VITAL POINTS then theres no way this theory is significant? Thats logical

  • OF COURSE you didn't see any windows. i mean, the plane is going 500 miles per hour you aren't going to see windows on a crashing plane...AND ALSO the pentagon, who cares if the building was kind of standing after the plane crashed? IT WAS GOING SO FAST i mean really! this guy believes what he wants to believe to to me they are LIES, this guy is ignorant and if A PLANE NEVER CRASHED INTO THE PENTAGON than where did the plane, and the people on the plane go? ANSWER THAT FOR ME NOW!!!

  • and these are all legitimate questions. I noticed myself the glow when the 1st plane hit, long b4 I started watching these films on YouTube.

    But, why didn't they wait to pull the buildings until later on that day? under the cover of darkness things are easier to hide and it would have built a better case for the total demise of the two towers. As far as I'm concerned, #7 looks like it was prepped ahead of time, so why not "pull" it after dark?

  • All truth

  • A LOT OF EVIDENCE HERE. THE ONLY THING I WANNA KNOW IS ON THE DAY OF THE CRASH WHERE DID THE PASSENGERS OF THE PLANES END UP? YES ONE PLANE ENDED UP IN THE PENNSYLVANIA LOCATION, BUT WHERE DID THE SECOND PLANE GO?

  • I do not understand, if this is a military plane so where are the passengers who board at the airport ?

  • @QPofHighGrade if thats true.. why would we cover it up as an airplane?

  • @RockOnEvry1 That's what i was asking sir. It's been suggested on other documentaries that perhaps something was fired to help the plane puncture the building more efficiently. And the 'object' seen on the underside resembles that of a military plane. Perhaps...

  • @Reminiscence26 Its saying that the flash happened before the planes struck the buildings. Theyre saying that the flash and the planes hitting the buildings happened at separate times.

  • wouldnt it be difficult to fly and crash a plane into the pentagon at that low to the ground? the terrorist probably just used a missile from a remote location, er somthing crazy like that.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more