Frederick Copleston on Schopenhauer: Section 2
Loading...
Top Comments
All Comments (80)
-
...whereas ANYBODY could have composed CharlesDilkes' post.
Someone equipped with ACTUAL intelligence would have formulated a more interesting reply.
-
And then whining about quantity. FIVE POST. What a scandal!
Eew! How often I've seen this!
Isn't it amazing how 99% of those drooling about a philospher can't even hold a conversation?
It's PATHETIC.
They actually think that the mere act of claiming they are very much into Copleston, or Derrida, or some other promoted anally-retentive 'thinker', will actually ensure they themselves will be considered 'very intelligent'.
Note how MY POST evidences intellectual activity taking place,...
-
@suddenlyitsobvious God, how pretentious. If anyone has the ego I think it's you.
-
*just about able to state certain philosphers are extremely interesting
-
Meaning you are just about able to suggest state philosophers are extremely interesting -allowing you to bask in their glory and suggest you are yourself one of the priveleged humans equipped with sufficient intelligence to grasp their work- but you can't actually make a substantive observation.
How very typical...
-
@suddenlyitsobvious Five posts that I think say more about you than anything else. I'd be so bold as to say that you don't really know enough about philosophy as a discipline to make the sort of diatribe you've just made.
-
(5)
...communicates, unless absolutely necessary. He's obviously a pompous egomaniac -meaning creativity or true intelligence is excluded.
Mind you, his works might be more interesting than suggested by this interview because they are often/typically 'edited' -if you can take a hint, but I see no reason for exploring it at this point.
If you opine though he has made some brilliant connections between historical ideas, I certainly wouldn't mind hearing which ones...
10:41
Frederick Copleston on Schopenhauer: Section 3by flame043022,580 views- 9:18
Fr. Frederick C. Copleston vs Bertrand Russell - Part 2by riversonthemoon19,528 views
- 0:48
Groening explains: what is philosophy good for?by cavakun147,308 views
- 4:19
Why Study Philosophy?by Logic1701B25,847 views
- 33:21
ON THE SUFFERINGS OF THE WORLD - Arthur Schopenhauerby drpaluga61,805 views
- 3:26
Bertrand Russell on God (1959)by AtheistMediaBlog584,548 views
- 6:09
Frederick Copleston on Schopenhauer: Section 5by flame043015,688 views
- 9:31
Anthony Quinton on Ludwig Wittgenstein: Section 2by flame043020,360 views
- 4:49
Iris Murdoch on Philosophy and Literature: Section 5by flame043012,427 views
- 8:51
Iris Murdoch on Philosophy and Literature: Section 4by flame043013,060 views
- 10:38
J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 3by flame043026,965 views
- 8:25
Geoffrey Warnock on Kant: Section 2by flame043029,902 views
- 10:24
On the Ideas of Quine: Section 3by flame043015,762 views
- 9:21
Peter Singer on Hegel and Marx: Section 2by flame043037,405 views
- 9:29
Schopenhauer vs. Hegelby UnorthodoxPoppycock8,223 views
- 6:58
John Passmore on Hume: Section 4by flame043012,851 views
- 10:14
Sidney Morgenbesser on the American Pragmatists: Section 1by flame043020,825 views
- 10:37
J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 2by flame043038,052 views
- 6:08
J.P. Stern on Nietzsche: Section 5by flame043020,905 views
- 10:13
Miles Burnyeat on Plato: Section 2by flame043042,706 views
hehheh this is less Frederick Copleston on Schopenhauer as much as it is Bryan Magee on Shopenhauer!
0neironaut 3 years ago 20
Who's the host and who's the guest? ( lol )
Heh, Magee probably thought, "Having this guy as a guest was a mistake".
ManilaSyndicate 2 years ago 14