Lane Bryant Lingerie Ad Banned By Fox & ABC

This is the controversial Lane Bryant lingerie ad banned by Fox and ABC for being too racy.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[ZangyaX]

Victoria Secret commercials are full of annorxic models in bras. But when someone more vulumpcious is in a bra and panties on a commercial...its too much and "too racey". Fuck outta here.

[jdoon5261]

She's built just like my wife and my wife is the sexiest woman I know. yeeha for big beautiful women.

[pauly2xs1]

thye must not pay Fox enough money....FUCK FOX MEDIA!!

[mutlijamesbondfan]

@BlueHeavenTheory I agree with you that these women actually have tits and ass to show off. I'm a guy and I think that most women on tv and so on... practically have nothing to show off and arn't that attractive. Even the new Bond girls in the movie SkyFall don't look that good too me at all.

[sukidesu36]

She is not 'big boned' or fat. She is a normal woman. Her name is Ashley Graham and she is 5'9" (aka taller than the majority of American women) and a size 16. So if she were the average height of 5'4", she'd be about a size 12, which is not fat by any means. Plus, she's hot, that's why they banned it. Men and boys alike would be watching TV drooling over her truly feminine figure.

[ThebloodyFairy Walsh]

because they're skinny doesn't mean they're anorexic you moron!

[olympia727]

It is rather ironic that Fox would ban this commercial. So many of their on-air female news personalities dress in a provocative manner. Just seems like a double-standard.

[Leon612]

Yeah those Victoria Secret women have big boobs shooting straight at your face and those aren't banned? LOL

[Chinfers]

A rare voice of reason in this ridiculous debate built on a false dichotomy ("stick thin" vs "real women").

[BlueHeavenTheory]

It was banned because these women actually have tits and ass to show off.

[EvanSol919]

How is this different from any Victorias Secret ad?

[EvanSol919]

How is this different from any Victorias Secret ad?