Chris Matthews V Howard Dean Over Massachusetts Election

20 January, 2010 MSNBC

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• matthews
• howard
• dean
• massachusetts
• election
• fight
• brawl
• pwned
• owned
• political
• politics
• news

[Melissaerb86]

Chris Matthews really is silly. Always. He was better in sports.

[FixedNewsChannel]

@Melissaerb86 Chris Matthews never worked in sports.

I'm not his biggest fan in the world, but let's keep a level here.

[Dolphinsrock81]

so let me get this st8.....the voters in mass. voted for a republican who wants to stop the health care bill and they actually support the policies of the democrats and their health care plans but were just trying to send a message that they were fed up with the status quo? so they voted for someone who doesnt hold the same values and beliefs as them? yeah, that makes sense. How can anyone actually support the democratic party when they do stupid stuff like this?

[arivas713]

Can't this guy just shut up and let the other guy talk for a second? Why does he even invite guests on? jeesh.

[Seedofwinter]

The voters ALWAYS vote for the other party when they are disenchanted. They don't have to like the party, it's just a way of showing displeasure. Also, like Dean said, they voted to KILL the bill. They rather have no bill than that POS bill, and I feel the same. It doesn't mean they voted because they are Republican.

Scott Brown won't win reelection, and Howard will be vindicated. Chris Matthews is a tool, I think, after watching this

[Seedofwinter]

@reignee11 The voter anger is there because Obama was planning on-and consequently did- give the Health insurance industry 40 million new customers, in lieu of the first step--public option-- to Private health insurance destruction.

How is Dean's logic fringe? Ted Kennedy has been fighting for Universal health care for 40 years and has never lost an election. Are you telling me that voters became Republican in one election cycle because the Democratic candidate was too liberal?

[Seedofwinter]

@Dolphinsrock81 Let's look at who's seat Scott Brown took: Ted Kennedy's. Ted Kennedy who has been trying to get health care through, on that same seat, for almost 40 years.

Now, he passes away and a special election is held to replace him and a Republican- who never had a chance in Massachusetts takes his seat. A republican that goes against the grain Kennedy's priorities

I think the fact that Obama gave 40 million new customers to the greedy health insurance companies cemented Brown's win.

[leonarddaccardi]

twist it, turn it, twist it again, dean is a flip flop poll dancer

[DartmouthAlum96]

Caligula was a saner leader than some of the bozos in Washington today.

[trademestuff]

@flizzleFlopper

No it's not, if your stuck in an undemocratic two-party system and want to send a message to the government that you are not happy with an agenda being proposed, you have to vote against the administration.

[flizzleFlopper]

@trademestuff...were Americans trying to send a message when they voted for Obama? Maybe they were always for Republicans all along...

Based on your completely insane argument, you lose either way...

..and since I'm an Auburn fan, I'll just assume that the AP voters really wanted us to win the national championship in 2004, but voted for SC to send a message....

[flizzleFlopper]

So, in liberal socialist utopia, you vote FOR the person who promises to fight AGAINST your agenda.

Hmm...got it!