What is Consciousness?
Uploader Comments (allisone00)
Top Comments
-
We have here the interesting notion that (to put it crudely) elementary particles manifest some kind of rudimentary free WILL. At the same time, it is the WILL of the observer, at some deep level of his being, that collapses the probability wave function of the particle so that it behaves in this way rather than that. Does this represent a kind of negotiation, as it were, a battle one could almost say, between particle and observer?
All Comments (40)
-
i dont even know what the comments mean
-
I have no problems believing in god, just not a "god" or any other human made up explanation that defines it. When people venture towards a god, it's usually their cultural region specific god with alot of human baggage and emotion. Since we cannot prove the existence of god we can only go by what we can detect, any other "feeling" is biased. We all have feelings but last time I check humans tend to do crazy things including killing each other because of "feelings".
-
Hello I am intreastead in every point of view on this matter please pm me and we will talk about this like gentlemen.
-
On the questionable premise of free will, he builds his argument from ignorance.
Doesn't hold water.
-
This doesn't make a lot of sense. Instead check out:
Dr. John Hagelin and the Discovery of the Unified Field
to better understand the nature of consciousness and it's role in the structure of the universe.
-
What does he mean? What is a phenomenon "at its on"?
-
4:36 "That what [visum sic] I call consciousness. It is that physical phenomena that induces a change at its ON, and I recognize that . . ."
-
That's perception. Though. That is not consciousness. Nice try trying to sound smart though.
-
Likely more related to interpretive skills.
The perception of the event affects the outcome by molding it to the perspective of the observer.
Free will is illusory, in the sense that we can affect cosmic energy flow. We can partake of it and by our presence, be part of the overall ramifications. Since we cannot opt ou" of the process, consciousness is just the awareness and recognition of what we are and how we must be.
That recognition is part of the process as well as our evolutionary nature.
You do realize of course, Dr. Singh, that your understanding of consciousness would violate the Law of Conservation of Mass/Energy. In order for a thought to be motivated by spontaneous energy, with no previous, external cause, that energy would have to be created all on its own, something any respectable physicist would scoff at.
theroamingfoot 3 years ago
Spontaneity is a degree of freedom (misdefined as randomness) that exists in nature. No respectable physicists can ignore the spontaneity of wave-particle duality, spontaneity of mass-energy equivalence, spontaneous expansion of the universe, spontaneous decay of the atom etc., which are all well-known physical phenomena having inherent spontaneity or consciousness or free will. None of them violate the laws of conservation. An awakening is needed for inanimate physics to become lifelike.
allisone00 3 years ago 3