Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Alex Jones Debates Globalist Think Tank Head 3/3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
28,048
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 22, 2011

Alex interviews Demos spokesperson Jamie Bartlett, who recently appeared in a BBC segment about the UK think tank with government ties who seek to 're-educate' schoolchildren on how to distinguish "credible" official information from 'untrustworthy' information on the Internet, including so-called conspiracy theories.
http://demos.co.uk/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/news/

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • That was an awesome show, Alex. Good job.

  • Nice guy or not, his organization is not an independent think tank in my humble opinion; it’s more akin to a steering organization for Socialism. His organization has staff, associates, trustees, experts and an advisory council full of ex politicians and corporate whores. His job is to raise doubt under the guise of so called rational proofs. Their role is to have us all go around in circles while the NWO continue with their agenda. It doesn’t wash and neither does his organization.

see all

All Comments (471)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DEMOS IS PRETTY CLOSE TO DEMONS

  • The only time i disagreed with Jamie Bartlett here, was when he refered to Alex as extremely intelligent.

  • "...i want people to criticize, to critique and to be skeptical about all the information they recieve"

    sounds good, sure ok... but dont try to do the above, and then attempt to form an opinion on some passports eh lol... this guest was unbelievable smh

  • @LittleMuckyMe Links to proven science? The explanations for the collapses and the refutations for the conspiracy theories can be found by a 4th grader on wikipedia. Just because nothing exactly like the collapses has happened before doesn't mean it didn't happen for the first time. This kind of obvious logic fail is why you will continue to be the laughing stock of the internet. Do you share Steven Jones' belief that Jesus visited the Mayans or just his thermite baloney? Fuck you are all stupid

  • @LittleMuckyMe actually you are misinformed about everything you say, the collapse has been perfectly explained and the links are all in those little blue numbers on wikipedia. 99+% of high-rise engineers agree with the explanations. Your little posse of ct's are as bright as creationist scientists. You make the world sick with the unprovable delusions. Maybe wondering "Will my children be ashamed of me for being part of a conspiracy cult?" will "wake you up" fucking retards

  • @robertk1968 Bro, they receive government funding, end of story.

  • @LittleMuckyMe

    Therefore critical thinking can only be used to develop an informed opinion based on rationalizing the information and not to determine what is true and what is not.

    When this guy points out holocaust denial sites as evidence that conspiracy theory is dangerous and thus children need to be taught critical thinking my immediate question to him would be if they were teaching how to apply critical thinking to government propaganda since propaganda is the ultimate conspiracy.

  • The truth of what this guy and his organisation are about will be defined by exactly how they teach critical thinking.

    If they give examples of how critical thinking can be used to debunk conspiracy theories that are not disproved then they are bad news, as critical thinking is not about discerning between opinion but about rationalising information so as to be able to extrapolate from it the most likely truth

    If we know something is fact or fiction there is no need to apply critical thinking.

  • @GeorgiaTheJungle

    You're right, you are very sad to the point of believing your own propaganda. How about you post links to "proven science" whatever that means. I think you meant scientific proof. There is no scientific proof that fire caused 3 high rise buildings to collapse in their own footprint and one of the reason for that is a high rise building had never before in history suffered total collapse from fire. All the is are the official theories V the demolition theory Numb-nuts.

  • @GeorgiaTheJungle i know ,,they arent trying to hide their crimes shipping guns to mexico to frame u.s. gun laws either,,,i know ,,the sun isnt warm if ya government say so,,, i know i know,,,u buy the con ,,its cosy and stress free ,,but it isnt real.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more